After i contacted the company ACCIONA MOBILITY they finally added
attribution on the app. and it's a new style, vertical. again plenty of
space for Mapbox logo. Maybe we should add vertical attribution on the
attribution guidance. check print here https://ibb.co/xLYrP3m
On 25/12/2019 19:17, Nuno Caldeira wrote:
doesn't surprise me. check this
https://docs.mapbox.com/mapbox-gl-js/example/attribution-position/
plenty of space for visible attribution, well mapbox attribution is
not hidden under an "i". I have reported another client of theirs that
I have reached out to ask for attribution, which they understood, but
still haven't fixed it. let's see if mapbox is in good will.
On Wed, 25 Dec 2019, 17:20 · Michael Medina, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
As a native English speaker this reads as complete stonewalling on
Mapbox’s part. I don’t know why OSM doesn’t just file a DMCA
complaint against Mapbox or deny them access. The OSM board should
also not have to go through the regular help channel to get
answers. Mapbox should escalate this issue to their top
administrators. I know the board likes to play nice, but Mapbox
isn’t playing nice so no reason to as far as I can tell.
Michael Medina
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 04:06 <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Send talk mailing list submissions to
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
than "Re: Contents of talk digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [Osmf-talk] Attribution guideline status update
(Nuno Caldeira)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 17:52:53 +0000
From: Nuno Caldeira <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: joost schouppe <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>, OSMF Talk
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>, OpenStreetMap talk
mailing list
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Attribution guideline status
update
Message-ID: <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Hi Mateusz,
They don't. Here's all my email exchange with them from
October 2018,
yes _*2018*_. it's more than enough with evidence and time to
be fixed.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/110XubCe0kd2HNtbqXS7U_vr44xyieaSt/view?usp=sharing
On 24/12/2019 07:08, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> Have they responded with anything
> (except automatic reply) ?
>
> Is there an assigned issue id?
>
>
> 23 Dec 2019, 21:32 by [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>:
>
> I sent this situation to Mapbox 10 months ago.
>
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 17:00 joost schouppe,
> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>
>
> As an xmas bonus, here's another Facebook
company (via
> Mapbox), Snapchat that is using OSM without
attribution
> requirements (funnily there's plenty of space for a
> reasonable and visible calculated mapbox logo
and text).
> They probably don't know, nor that they have
been asked to
> comply over a year ago, nor have agreed with the
license
> in every aspect of it when stated using OSM
data, nor read
> Mapbox TOS, or Mapbox been informed on these
repeated
> offenders, nor read the multiples reports in mailing
> lists, nor that they had a employee that ran for
OSMF board.
>
> https://map.snapchat.com/
>
> Let's continue to be hypocrites and pretend
nothing is
> going on for over a year with these two
companies that are
> corporate members of OSMF and should be the
first ones to
> give examples. Enough with excuses.
>
>
> The Snapchat case is a pretty clear example of how
not to do
> things. If there's space for Mapbox, there's space for
> OpenStreetMap. But I don't think Snapchat has
anything to do
> with Facebook.
>
> Phil, I hope you contacted them directly and not
through Facebook.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20191224/e4cbcf8f/attachment.htm>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
------------------------------
End of talk Digest, Vol 184, Issue 39
*************************************
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
