Hello all, > Yes, and 10 years ago headers were named "kludges".
and point is? > There is even less reason to keep this "feature" in. All it does is > cause confusion. Nothing more. OK, You are confused, still there is no reason to remove any feature You do not understand or not use. > The question is: why would anyone want to use it? Like the first > "feature" I mentioned it doesn't serve any purpose whatsoever, and it > is a possible source of confusion. I do use it with other friends working on projects and it is good to know who replied to in long discussion without checking previous messages. > I did not mention headers (kludges). It's some kind of URL, only > useful for fellow Beta! users. fellow Beta! users? This is ridiculus! Check RFC 2111: http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=2111 ---- The Uniform Resource Locator (URL) schemes, "cid:" and "mid:" allow references to messages and the body parts of messages. For example, within a single multipart message, one HTML body part might include embedded references to other parts of the same message. ---- > In Forte Agent I can doubleclick on a > Message-ID anywhere in the message and it finds the correct message. > If I want to search for a malformed Beta! specific "Message URL" I > have to open it in an editor and edit it. It's completely useless! useless for who? I am using it daily. Useless for Forte users? Maybe, but this is not TB's fault, this is correct behaviour. > Ritlabs should have implemented a method like Agent uses in the first > place, instead of "inventing" its own strange workaround. TB's own strange workaround? OMG >>And if other clients does not support it, this is reason to remove it from >>TB? Why?? > Because it adds useless complexity into a mail client that's already > bloated and bug-ridden. Ritlabs should grab any opportunity to remove > crappy, bug-prone and/or idiosyncratic uselesness from the code in > order to make it leaner, meaner and easier to use and maintain. OK, Your personal opinion. > But they won't do that. Because Arjan told it? That's all? >>> It's these and other "features" like mugshots and betamoticons that >>> lead me to believe that Beta! developers and chronical beta! list >>> habituals alike are living in a world of their own and are impervious >>> and hostile towards input from outside. Like I said before: it just >>> behaves like some kind of sect. >>You should comment something You understand and know about, somebody could >>call You stupid. As I see, You are here to create flames only, You should >>use another list instead. Thank You > And thank you too for proving my point. this is list You are subscribed for many years, I still do not understand, why are You here so long, if You are writing words about habituals or sect now. Use link bellow for unsubscribe and You will be free. Thank You > Imperviousness, hostility and obliviousness regarding things that really > matter. You say I am dropping flame-bait, I say I am just speaking the > (uneasy) truth. This is "Your" truth. I see no hostility here, never saw in past. Nobody forces us nor You to be here. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 5.0.12.1 under Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.2.6.4 Notebook Thinkpad, Core2 Duo 2.40 GHz, 4 GB RAM ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 5.0.12.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
