Hello RS, Saturday, June 16, 2012, 9:03:10 PM, you wrote:
>>> Another problem with IMAP is that the messages have to actually be >>> kept on the server. >> that's not the problem with IMAP, it's the beauty of IMAP. It's the >> whole point. RF> Up to the moment your e-mail box is equal to about 8GB and something RF> happens so you need to reinstall your client and re-download 8GB while RF> on POP3 you can keep a local copy and have it reinstalled within an RF> hour or less. RF> Another matter is that you need a server to store so much data and it RF> likely to increase a cost (my e-mail box is about plus 1-1.2GB each RF> year). Thank you for your support! I thought I was the only one who is happy with POP. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 5.1.6.4 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 5.1.6.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
