Hello Allie Martin, on Sat, 7 Feb 2004 22:20:49 -0500 (2004-02-08 04:20:49 in .nl) in the message with reference <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you [AM] wrote (at least in part):
MDP>> That makes no sense. Clearly Symantec has switched itself into an MDP>> aggressive AV stance that *will* impede you again. Like I say, it MDP>> has done this to others before. Why should you now be immune again? AM> Are you referring to an update that has enhanced/changed how it behaves? I could 'adimre' Peter Norton's in the DOS days, as MDP has stated before. Learned some from it also, at that time. But not these days as NAV and Symantec are the same corp, to my knowledge. -- Kind regards, Peter Ouwehand E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - - Created the above using A program which insists to be : The Bat! V2.03 Beta/59 An OS which insists to be : Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.03 Beta/59 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
