Hi Peter,

Sunday, February 8, 2004, 12:26:39 PM, you wrote:

MDP>>> That makes no sense. Clearly Symantec has switched itself into
MDP>>> an aggressive AV stance that *will* impede you again. Like I
MDP>>> say, it has done this to others before. Why should you now be
MDP>>> immune again?

AM>> Are you referring to an update that has enhanced/changed how it behaves?

PO> I could 'adimre' Peter Norton's in the DOS days, as MDP has
PO> stated before. Learned some from it also, at that time. But not
PO> these days as NAV and Symantec are the same corp, to my
PO> knowledge.

I'll have to see how it goes from here.  Obviously, if this problem
resurfaces again and again, I'll make some kind of adjustment, either
in the AV settings or in the choice of AV program.  But the bottom
lines are: 1) it's happened once, that's all, 2) the protection
worked, and 3) no data was ever in any danger of being lost.  Items 2
and 3 are the absolutely critical items IMO.  Item 1 could get to be
an issue, but it will have to happen again, first.

-- 
 
Best,

Yuki

Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/59 on Windows XP
5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 2.03 Beta/59 | "Using TBBETA" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to