Thursday, August 23, 2007, 12:40:11 AM, you wrote: > In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
*snip* > I'm going to cite Walter Bright regarding something everybody was > doing differently: > "As James Kanze explained on comp.lang.c++.moderated, DMC++ is correct > according to the Standard. However, nobody else does it that way, and > the Standard is going to be changed to make such code correct." LOL!! I remember that one. The standard was never changed. heh > Either TB is wrong or the standard must be changed. I really don't > care which... TB is wrong. There is absolutely _no_ question about it. None. You can't just have EVERY SINGLE email program EVER written, do it one way, then TB! does it another way and then say that TB! is doing it the correct way. Only a fool would look at emails from 1996, showing up in 2007 DEFAULT view filters with a 'RECEIVED' date of 2007 and say its correct. Thats just crazy. Ritlabs is a small - very small - team of developers. Other email programs (apart from Pocomail) are written and supported by large corporations and/or groups. Eudora is probably one of the oldest ubiquitous email readers on the planet. It existed before RFC and over the years has gone through many - many - revisions. It still does it right. RFC or not. I stopped using it because (1) they bloated it (2) they ended up periodically charging for major upgrades which ended up having bug fixes from previous versions. If you wanted a version just for the bug fixes in a prior version which you already _paid_ for, you had to to pay for the upgrade even if there is nothing in the upgrade that you actually wanted. Thats why its sales dropped to the point where they are practically given it away now with ad support. -- cheers, Indie_Dev ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
