Hello Stefan, On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:23:33 +0200 GMT (19/01/2008, 06:23 +0700 GMT), Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
PO>> Let's say what I dislike of 'PTV' behaviour I noticed starting with PO>> this alpha: PO>> - how signatures are displayed PO>> - not using fixed-width fonts (http / mid links) ST> These things are configurable - you can set it all to a single ST> monospaced font in a single colour. Actually, I'm thinking of ST> different display profiles you can apply to a viewer. I guess, it's ST> not a bad idea... It's a very bad idea from where I sit. The PTV is set to Courier New, which I like for texts in Latin letters, like English. Thai letters look horrible in it. The RTV is set to AngsanaUPS, which I like for texts in Thai. I looks very ugly when displaying texts in English. The fact that I couldn't make the PTV to display a different font from the RTV made me downgrade back to 4.0.0.6. The loss of the flexibility of easily changing the font is a show-stopper for me. I thought making MicroEd UTF-aware would enable me to display UTF-encoded messages in the PTV. That would have been a real improvement over having to view them in the RTV! I grudgingly accepted viewing them in the RTV, waiting for the improvement. Now it's even worse: Even non-UTF encoded message are displayed in AngsanaUPC. No good at all. -- Cheers, Thomas. Sign in a shop: Open 24 hours a day, longer on weekends. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.0.6 (ALPHA) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.0.0.12 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
