Hello Lars! On Wednesday, August 25, 2004 at 6:54:11 AM you wrote:
> No, sorry. The burden is on site of the email software I use. Well, TB *does* offer a solution. The dreaded Windows editor was only added upon request from users not wanting to use MicroEd (still beats me on the whys). As long as a software has a way to do it "correctly" I can't see why there is a burden to fix it on the developers. > The recomendations have their origin in days, where the most > users had no access to graphical user interfaces. But this times lie > back over 15 years by now. And even on today mail systems that are > accessed with no GUI, it should be no problem to break the lines in > the recieving software. 1. I don't see any reason that time alone dictates if something is right or not. 2. Why break the formatting of a text? I want my lines sent and read in a specific way. And that is in all probability not the same as any other software will do it. 3. This sounds more and more like the ages old discussion on the merits of TB's original editor, and those arguments have all been traded. -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 2.13 "Lucky" Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request Sonar no cuesta nada (Tr�umen kostet nichts.). ________________________________________________________ http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
