Lars S�lter, [LS] wrote: >> Ok. Let's look at this. TB! will window wrap unwrapped text. The wrap >> length will therefore be dictated by the viewer width.
> I must admit, that I don't read the mail in the preview pane, but > in a seperate window - and what you are mentioning is one of the > reasons. If it is so is so annoying to read warped mail in the > preview pane, defineable linewarping in the reader seems to be an > other important but lacking core feature of The Bat!. This is a lacking core feature in the overwhelming majority of e-mail clients. Check it out. This is one of the reasons why the recommendation to wrap text at below 80 characters still exists and remains a default setting for the majority of e-mail clients, despite the modern computer display era. > Some thing must be totally wrong, if I get flamed in the mailinglist > of a software - for using this software. :) You're warping the issue and making it seem ridiculous when it really isn't. TB! can be made to do a lot of things that will make others complain. Some features/components do not work properly because they're buggy, incomplete or lacking in functionality that is important to us and others who receive your messages. Should we use those features? - Re: numbering makes non-TB! users complain. - Initialled quote prefixing makes non-TB! users complain. - Not wrapping text will make both TB! and non-TB! users complain. - Defining a character limit of 120 characters will make both TB! and non-TB! users complain. There are other examples. I've always told others that the Windows Editor isn't a good solution despite its being there. It doesn't send what you're seeing as you type. It doesn't do the necessary exercise of wrapping on sending. I'll never consider using it until it wraps on sending since it lacks a core feature. > And the best is, while complaining about lacking or not working > features, I get told - in the same mail - that there is no reason to > complain about. I disagree that there isn't a reason to complain. Those who wish to use the Windows Editor should complain/comment on the lack of proper formatting when sending. The implementation is incomplete without that function and I myself do wonder 'why bother with the whole thing if such an important feature isn't included'. If you really cannot manage using MicroEd, then I'll remember this when reading your messages and work with you. :) -- Allie Martin [List Moderator and fellow end-user] � My PGP-Keys: http://key.ac-martin.com � The Bat!� v2.13 "Lucky" Beta/7 � Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2) ..... Never draw fire, it irritates everyone around you ________________________________________________________ http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
