Hello Lars! On Wednesday, August 25, 2004 at 3:02:40 AM you wrote, in part:
LS> Yes, The Bat! offers some kind of solution (even if it no LS> real option for many users). But the original point in the LS> starting posts was, that Ritlabs is adding new features every day, LS> without getting them ready to use. Instead of implementing a new LS> editor, that can be configured, to act like the old MicroEd thingy LS> or like an enhanced editor control, we are stuck with MicroEd and LS> an editor control, ... To offer another point of view and a different experience: I was delighted to discover the "floating cursor" and the easy wrapping in the MicroEd editor when I first began using The Bat! in the fall of 2002. It came to me with a feeling of liberation, because it was so much better for me than the behavior of Microsoft Word. There is so much about The Bat! which is right for me, beginning with the safety that the Message Dispatcher affords and going right on to its ongoing development. Anyone who reads tbbeta can see how hard the RitLabs team is working to meet the needs of its present and future customer base. I do think that a good deal of the discussion on-going here might have been better on tbudl or tbot. And some of the topic angles might also have been shaped to easily fit the requirements of tbbeta. -- Mary The Bat 2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________________ http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
