Graham Foster, [GF] wrote: > I'd ignore this whiner who clearly can't get his infrastructure sorted, > and carry on signing. ;)
Yes. I'm inclined to continue signing. Though I wish to please everyone I can't. I'll do everything I can to please as many as I can and always feel frustrated that I can't please all because of limitations with the system we work with. Since PGP/MIME signing has created a lot of peace with my and others signed messages, I'd prefer using it. > As you can see, I'm using Thunderbird now for reading this list at > least, (as I value your contributions), and because Thunderbird manages > your posts (on our infrastructure) FAR better than TB! does. ThunderBird has some neat features. It'll suppress the viewing of the PGP stuff when messages are signed inline and not PGP/MIME. I'm sure that its ability to suppress the signature stuff comes as a result of the problems many have with comfort while reading inline signed messages. So, yes, clients like ThunderBird have taken the initiative of dealing with common problems with e-mail message formatting at the recipients end. If this was more commonly done, then we'd have a lot less to worry or complain about when sending or reading e-mail. > (Pity I can't send you the screen dumps to demonstrate). You could send me them off-list. I wish to see what you have to be putting up with. :) -- Allie Martin [List Moderator and fellow end-user] � My PGP-Keys: http://key.ac-martin.com � The Bat!� v2.13 "Lucky" Beta/7 � Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2) ..... Oxymoron: Rising Deficits.
________________________________________________________ http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
