Allie Martin wrote:
OK - Just thought I'd chip in. Allie - your use of inline signing makes your messages (and everyone else who does the same) unreadable to me.Lars S�lter, [LS] wrote:
Or the poster, that has complained about my long lines could use
a email software to read email - I know, a rather stunning concept.
Sorry. The burden is on you to make your messages readable for all those who may wish to read them.
I know it's not your fault - its a problem with our gateway software. Problem is - should I blame you? As you can see from the attachments, The Bat makes an AWFUL job of rendering your message, and also makes it impossible to reply to. (the header info from your message is lost in the attachments)
Thunderbird however handles a mangled message FAR more smoothly, and (as you can see) even allows me to reply to it.
I'd like to read your messages Allie. Please would you stop inlining signing them then I can?
Thanks
Graham
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
