On Thursday, September 23, 1999, 22:59:49 PM +0200, Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
composed profoundly about 'Anti-spam filters (was:Re[5]: List Administration Note)':

SL>     In short, the way that spammers operate, they aren't going to put the
SL> address in there with everyone else's since it doesn't put the ad up front and
SL> it increases the size of the data block.  They aren't going to address them
SL> individually because that requires them to send the data block once for each
SL> individual message.  If you are getting hit by spammers that do that, rest
SL> assured that they are newbie script kiddies who will get caught in short order
SL> and most likely never do it again.  Those who do it repeatedly, however, will
SL> not do it that way and those are the ones that will spam you multiple times on
SL> different ads.

 Steve,

 I,  sure, am aware that it takes ALOT less resources when BCCing addresses.
However,  as I told before, _I_ am getting only ~5% of spam this way. Today,
with leased line, sending 50MB of info is matter of minutes, if not seconds,
therefore  this  is  not  and  couldn't  be  a  problem.  What  I've noticed
additionally:  spammers  are changing their email addresses on the fly, with
each  individual  mail.  It's  quite often for me to get few same spams with
interval   of   few   minutes,   first   of   which  came  from,  let's  say
[EMAIL PROTECTED],  second  one  from  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  - note
different  numbers.  They  are  surely  doing  this  to  make filtering more
difficult.  This indirectly confirms my thesis of the progress in their mail
clients and 'preparing' each mail individually.



--
   Greetz, Arunas Norvaisa - Little Guy, The Masses Inc.
Composed in Kaunas, Lithuania on Friday, September 24, 1999 22:05 +0200
Best file compressor around: DEL *.* (100% compression!)



-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to