Monday, November 22, 1999, 7:26:01 PM, Paula wrote:
> I would say that if the user has put a %SkipHeader macro in the
> template, then TB shouldn't worry about whether or not there is anything
> entered in the header, unless the intent is to allow the %SkipHeader
> only if the TO is filled in. I don't see the need for having to ensure
> that the TO is filled in.
Neither do I since the TO field doesn't need to be filled in for a valid
message. ;)
> It would be nice to be able to start in the body.
That it would. I like the idea of a template definition, just not sure if
I want to fully endorse another template macro which is nothing more than a
toggle that is better served, IMHO, by checkboxes on the templates.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
