Hi Steve,
Monday, January 10, 2000, 9:51:08 PM, you wrote:
SL> Oh, this is bad. This speaks very badly for TB! production if this is
SL> true. Effective newsreading is completely different than effective email
SL> reading. Why they share common technical specifications and appear, on
SL> the
SL> surface, to also share a lot in how they are processed it simply is not
SL> the
SL> case. All I see this is leading heavily into code bloat, especially with
SL> the
SL> ominous reference to "ideology."
Going
LG>>> - Will version 2.0 fully support HTML both in sending,
>> Yes.
SL> Very bad.
Going
LG>>> and viewing href'd images?
>> This will be possible when we will write our own Web browser - I
>> guess, this is a topic for another interview, but you should wait for
>> it for several months :-)
SL> Very, VERY bad.
Still going
LG>>> - Will v2.0 support hooks for virus scanning attachments to messages?
>> Yes.
SL> *VERY* Bad.
Gone:-(
--
Best regards,
Mark
Using The Bat! 1.39 Beta/1
under Windows 98 4 10 Build 1998
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
