Hello Mark,
*exactly*!!!!
Derek
Written in response to your letter of Monday, January 10, 2000, 8:06:44 PM:
MA> Hi Steve,
MA> Tuesday, January 11, 2000, 12:28:21 AM, you wrote:
>>> but that does not really appeal. Any suggestions for another Windows MUA
>>> that come close to TB, as it is now?
SL>> PMMail? *shrug*
MA> Yes ,exactly a choice of one, TB really cannot compete with the "all
MA> in one " no-brainer LookOut type appz they should stick with what they
MA> are good at, they have a niche market of users who appreciate a mostly
MA> RFC compliant client which does not attempt to be "all things to all
MA> people". If you try to do that you end up with the lowest common
MA> denominator, and might as well use LookOut. I appreciate that RIT are
MA> a business, and should try to maximize their user base, but they are
MA> on a hiding to nothing competing with LookOut and Eudora so they
MA> would be better off keeping their niche market happy (i.e. most people
MA> on this list). Their "natural" market is the new Linux user looking
MA> for something more friendly than Fetchmail/Sendmail et al, as you have
MA> pointed out in the past there is nothing currently in Linux that meets
MA> the needs of a user with multiple ISP accounts. XFMail comes close but
MA> the interface needs work, and xforms are not Open Source AFAIK.
--
Best regards,
Derek mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
