Friday, July 28, 2000, 1:51:07 AM, Marck wrote:
TF>> I see your point. How about tabs at the bottom then? This way you know
TF>> there are attacheements, and I really don't need big icons. I have now
TF>> icons on the left side, plus tabs for some of the attachments.
> IMHO we're starting to get cyclic on this one. All of the suggestions
> are in and the opinions are stated. Let's leave this topic now for the
> RIT folk to make the call on where when if and which implementation
> suits their development plans.
> DEAD HORSE pronounced.
Uhm, rescind that please. We were not getting cyclic and, in fact, have
been moving forward the whole time. If there was ever a bad call for a DH,
this is its poster child. If you had a problem with me pointing out how
disruptive icons in the middle of text was, take it up with me.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
