Hi Steve,

On Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:16:24 -0700GMT (28/07/2000, 07:16 +0800GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:

>> You don't look at any of the headers in any form before reading a
>> message?

SL>     Look, no.  Scan, yes.

Fundamental difference between you and me. In office email, I *need*
to look at the TO and CC fields. shft-crtl-K is cumbersome.


>> *I* would prefer if attachment showed inline simply because of the
>> fact that I choose not to open them nor do I care that they exist >90%
>> of the time.

SL>     Then why would you want them inline?  I mean, really, it is easier to
SL> ignore a single icon high window at the bottom...

[nice graphic illustration skipped]

I see your point. How about tabs at the bottom then? This way you know
there are attacheements, and I really don't need big icons. I have now
icons on the left side, plus tabs for some of the attachments.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.  

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.45
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.



-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------

You are subscribed as : [email protected]


Reply via email to