On 23-09-2000 at 15:43, Ming-Li kindly wrote:
> On Thursday, September 21, 2000, 12:14:17 PM, Karin wrote:
>> I have one other, rather important worry: continuity.
>> TB is produced by a small company and written and maintained
>> by a team of only two programmers ...
> My bigger worry, though, is some software giant would gobble up RIT
> and turn TB into junkware or kill it (or its development, as in
> Forte Agent's case). Some companies are very good at such things (MS
> and Symantec sprint to mind).
Exactly.
> Worried as I was, I decided TB worth the risk. And the price isn't
> too large since TB can export its message bases to standard unix
> mbox format, which can be imported into virtually any email
> software. As long as the emergency exit is there, I won't loose my
> sleep.
After checking out TB's export functions, I reasoned the
same: _if_ TB would be discontinued, I could either continue
using the latest / least buggy / most suitable version, or
I can start looking for a new mail client, export mail and
start
anew.
- K -
--
I've often thought that there should be beauty contests
for the insides of bodies.
- David Cronenberg: Dead Ringers
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
