Marck,
On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, at 18:47:46 [GMT +0100] (which was 11:17 PM where I live) you
wrote:
MDP>> ... except that Raj has already said that the .att attachments
MDP> ^^^ Make that "Dave" (sorry Raj).
You are not 100% wrong. I did raise this point sometime back. And like I somebody
said
most of the cases the attachment is rubbish. If its important then the sender
reminds me
and & I use the tool from fentun.com.
There is still a problem with TB & RTF attachments though. One still needs to copy
the
attachment and save it as filenam.rtf to be able to read it. I recollect the
earlier
versions (maybe over a year back) did not have that problem.
TGIF, Have a great weekend!
--
Warm regards,
Raj
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Replied on Friday, August 31, 2001 using TB Ver 1.54 Beta/4
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
