On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 05:55, Allie C Martin wrote: > > JA> Maybe if somebody that has regular contact with the developers > JA> (Marck? Allie?) pose the above theory, they may have another > JA> stand point to view things from, > > Me? I can't remember the last time I had direct dialog with any of > the developers. :)
Was worth a shot. I know that some people on user lists often converse with the developers regularly ;) > Personally I've never had this problem and like Marck, TB! on my > machine, collects mail from MDaemon on my server across the LAN. TB! > polls for mail every 60 secs. and I run it 24/7 as well. Neither have I... I use qpopper (see www.qpopper.com), or I think the one on my UK ISP is a Microsoft product, the name escapes me. > I guess it's likely to be a server side issue that TB! no longer > addresses gracefully or one solution has created another problem. This would match perfectly I guess. Especially if they put some better error handling in on one event, and didn't apply it to another, it may have made a bug that was there more prominent, or make a new bug. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
