Hello Richard, Wednesday, September 11, 2002, 11:59:51 PM, you wrote:
RL>>> That certainly seems to rule out NAV as the culprit then. TBH I RL>>> wouldn't feel safe without running an anti-virus and firewall RL>>> while connected to the net. >> No, this is not what is meant. There are other anti-virus programs out >> there, and NAV has a reputation for false positives anyway. A change >> wouldn't be to the worse. > In the two years or so that I've been running NAV I've yet to have anything > nasty get onto my PC So from that point of view I'm very reluctant to > change, plus it means paying out for yet another program. Any suggestions? I > did consider maybe going to the newer just released 2003 version might be a > good idea. > As others have reported the same error as me and are not users of NAV I'm > inclined to think this that in this case NAV is the culprit. Whoops! should have read ......NAV is NOT" the culprit. :) -- Best regards, Richard Lane - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Magnum Opus http://www.magnumopus.co.uk ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
