Hello Thomas, Wednesday, September 11, 2002, 8:52:18 AM, you wrote:
> Hello Richard, > On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 00:04:37 +0100 GMT (11/09/02, 06:04 +0700 GMT), > Richard Lane wrote: RL>> That certainly seems to rule out NAV as the culprit then. TBH I RL>> wouldn't feel safe without running an anti-virus and firewall RL>> while connected to the net. > No, this is not what is meant. There are other anti-virus programs out > there, and NAV has a reputation for false positives anyway. A change > wouldn't be to the worse. In the two years or so that I've been running NAV I've yet to have anything nasty get onto my PC So from that point of view I'm very reluctant to change, plus it means paying out for yet another program. Any suggestions? I did consider maybe going to the newer just released 2003 version might be a good idea. As others have reported the same error as me and are not users of NAV I'm inclined to think this that in this case NAV is the culprit. -- Best regards, Richard Lane - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Magnum Opus http://www.magnumopus.co.uk ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
