Hi Charles, On Friday, July 16, 2004 01:50 your local time, which was 00:50 my local time, Charles Gerungan [CMG] wrote;
CW>> 1. I tried connecting to my IMAP server straight through SpamPal with no CW>> TLS and therefore no stunnel. CMG> My bad. I would've thought you'd tried this. CW>> This again causes a the disconnection. CMG> That's why I said "this is an stunnel issue, if that.". It could be CMG> time-out issues on the server, severe latency -- whatever. I not sure if the above made sense, but when connecting to the IMAP server without TLS and therefore without stunnel, I'm still getting the 'Server Closed Connection' message? This is purely TB! and SpamPal, no stunnel. Another thing I do notice though, I SpamPal still has the connection to the server open!? Therefore, I'm think TB! is losing it's connection with SpamPal for some reason? Any ideas? CW>> Also, on closer inspection of the mail headers (F9), I notice that the CW>> SpamPal headers are not added!? CMG> I wouldn't know. CW>> Is this correct with IMAP, as all my mail through POP has both the CW>> SpamPal and the baysian (SpamPal plug-in) headers added!? CMG> That would a great question to ask on the SpamPal list. Ok, on further inspection of the 558 page document (Ritlabs, are you taking note? :D ), I remember reading something about IMAP mail not being tagged in the headers, just purely moved to a spam folder. -- Regards, Chris Created using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
