Hello Chris, On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 20:03:01 +0100 UTC, Chris Weaven wrote:
CW> I not sure if the above made sense, but when connecting to the IMAP CW> server without TLS and therefore without stunnel, I'm still getting the CW> 'Server Closed Connection' message? It did make sense. Did I make sense? That's why I asked you to see if you could try with another IMAP account. Alternatively, you could connect to your IMAP server with telnet and see when it times out. CW>>> Is this correct with IMAP, as all my mail through POP has both the CW>>> SpamPal and the baysian (SpamPal plug-in) headers added!? Good assumption. It seems logical as SpamPal is not acting as a gateway for IMAP. It could however add a X-header field. -- Regards, Charles. TB! 2.12 RC/4 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 / Courier IMAP 3.0.5
pgpq5Az3TX7qR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
