Hello Arjan, On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:31:38 +0200 GMT (14/Jun/09, 5:31 +0700 GMT), Arjan de Groot wrote:
>> You can not change Message-ID and there is no need to change >> In-Reply-To header which includes Message-ID of replied message. AdG> Let's not go nit-picking over which headers need changing or not. Too late. AdG> (X-Rogue is a header that doesn't need adding or changing, because it AdG> is only used by or interesting for a very small minority of Beta! AdG> users, who, in turn, represent only a very small minority of the total AdG> e-mailing population.) No, we are the majority. And we side with the smiley-fraction. This is far more important than IMAP and all that modern crap. Replying to HTML correctly - who needs that, apart from a few professionals? They are clearly the minority. Let's keep promoting the ban of HTML emails - there are even nice smiley ribbons to go with it. Let's stay in the last century, it was so nice, wasn't it? -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.1.11 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
