On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Ted Hardie <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Martin, > > Thanks for the correction, but I confess I'm still a little confused. I > understood in the room that you saw rough consensus on the list to go > forward with both, based on the call that went to the list and ended on the > 20th. This was something Mirja and I both argued for, and the minutes note > you saying "Martin: look at the mailing list. There is consensus about > adopting both. There is tine to work on both." > This matches my understanding of the understanding of what happened in the room and is confirmed by my review of the minutes. -Ekr > When I saw the message, I thought that you were confirming on the list > that this was the way forward, but this message appears to re-open the > question from the start. I'd really rather we didn't start over again. > Can we start with the sense of the room/previous list consensus instead, > and look only to see if there is a groundswell of objection from those not > in the room? > > I have not, mind you, looked at the recordings yet, and if you would like > to before making a further adjustment, I'd certainly understand. > > Thanks, > > Ted > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Martin Stiemerling <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> Dear all, >> >> **Please use this CORRECTED version, as one option to choose from below >> didn't make it into the original.**** >> Thanks to Erik Rescola for pointing this out to me directly. >> >> This point got lost on the mailing list, but it has been decided in the >> WG session here at IETF-93 that there will be a Last Call for consensus >> about which document of the below ones to take as starting point for the WG. >> >> >> Here are the two drafts: >> a) draft-rescorla-tcpinc-tls-option-03 >> b) draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-03 >> >> Please respond to the tcpinc wg mailing list until >> >> July 31st, 2015 >> 1pm CEST >> >> on wether you prefer >> - either draft a) or b) >> - both drafts (a & b) as WG items >> - or none >> >> to be accepted as WG item(s). >> >> Please write also your brief reasoning on why you made your choice. >> >> Please note that accepting a draft is not the end of working on the >> technical content of the draft, but it is actually the starting point when >> the WG has full change control about the content of the draft! >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Martin Stiemerling >> Transport Area Director >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tcpinc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Tcpinc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc >
_______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
