Hi Martin, On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Martin Stiemerling <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > This call is a simple procedural step: > There were hums in the session on whether to go for just a), just b), or > both. This call is simply to confirm the hums out of the WG session on the > list, no more. > > Everything out of the a WG meeting needs to be confirmed on the mailing > list. I do not think that anybody is disagreeing about this, right? > > Of course everything needs to be confirmed on the list, but I'm used to folks recording the consensus from the room as part of the call for confirmation. I was a bit confused without that, because this looked like a restart of the discussion. If we are agreed on what the result of the meeting was (that both are going to go forward for further work) and are confirming that, then I think my confusion is resolved now. For final confirmation, do you wish to have those of us who were (probably over) vocal in the meeting to record our voices again here? regards, Ted > Thanks, > > Martin > > >> Thanks, >> >> Ted >> >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Martin Stiemerling <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> **Please use this CORRECTED version, as one option to choose from >> below didn't make it into the original.**** >> Thanks to Erik Rescola for pointing this out to me directly. >> >> This point got lost on the mailing list, but it has been decided in >> the WG session here at IETF-93 that there will be a Last Call for >> consensus about which document of the below ones to take as starting >> point for the WG. >> >> >> Here are the two drafts: >> a) draft-rescorla-tcpinc-tls-option-03 >> b) draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-03 >> >> Please respond to the tcpinc wg mailing list until >> >> July 31st, 2015 >> 1pm CEST >> >> on wether you prefer >> - either draft a) or b) >> - both drafts (a & b) as WG items >> - or none >> >> to be accepted as WG item(s). >> >> Please write also your brief reasoning on why you made your choice. >> >> Please note that accepting a draft is not the end of working on the >> technical content of the draft, but it is actually the starting >> point when the WG has full change control about the content of the >> draft! >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Martin Stiemerling >> Transport Area Director >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tcpinc mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc >> >> >>
_______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
