Am 24.07.15 um 12:19 schrieb Ted Hardie:
Hi Martin, On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Martin Stiemerling <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This call is a simple procedural step: There were hums in the session on whether to go for just a), just b), or both. This call is simply to confirm the hums out of the WG session on the list, no more. Everything out of the a WG meeting needs to be confirmed on the mailing list. I do not think that anybody is disagreeing about this, right? Of course everything needs to be confirmed on the list, but I'm used to folks recording the consensus from the room as part of the call for confirmation. I was a bit confused without that, because this looked like a restart of the discussion. If we are agreed on what the result of the meeting was (that both are going to go forward for further work) and are confirming that, then I think my confusion is resolved now.
We confirm the hums out of the session at IETF-93. This includes to confirm on the list that there is or isn't rough consensus for either a), b), (a & b) or none.
For final confirmation, do you wish to have those of us who were (probably over) vocal in the meeting to record our voices again here?
Yes, please! Thank you, Martin _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
