On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Ted Hardie <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Martin, > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Martin Stiemerling <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> This call is a simple procedural step: >> There were hums in the session on whether to go for just a), just b), or >> both. This call is simply to confirm the hums out of the WG session on the >> list, no more. >> >> Everything out of the a WG meeting needs to be confirmed on the mailing >> list. I do not think that anybody is disagreeing about this, right? >> >> > Of course everything needs to be confirmed on the list, but I'm used to > folks recording the consensus from the room as part of the call for > confirmation. I was a bit confused without that, because this looked like > a restart of the discussion. If we are agreed on what the result of the > meeting was (that both are going to go forward for further work) and are > confirming that, then I think my confusion is resolved now. > For reference, this is memorialized in Tero's mail from Tuesday: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpinc/current/msg00577.html -Ekr For final confirmation, do you wish to have those of us who were (probably > over) vocal in the meeting to record our voices again here? > > regards, > > Ted > > > > >> Thanks, >> >> Martin >> >> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Ted >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Martin Stiemerling <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> **Please use this CORRECTED version, as one option to choose from >>> below didn't make it into the original.**** >>> Thanks to Erik Rescola for pointing this out to me directly. >>> >>> This point got lost on the mailing list, but it has been decided in >>> the WG session here at IETF-93 that there will be a Last Call for >>> consensus about which document of the below ones to take as starting >>> point for the WG. >>> >>> >>> Here are the two drafts: >>> a) draft-rescorla-tcpinc-tls-option-03 >>> b) draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-03 >>> >>> Please respond to the tcpinc wg mailing list until >>> >>> July 31st, 2015 >>> 1pm CEST >>> >>> on wether you prefer >>> - either draft a) or b) >>> - both drafts (a & b) as WG items >>> - or none >>> >>> to be accepted as WG item(s). >>> >>> Please write also your brief reasoning on why you made your choice. >>> >>> Please note that accepting a draft is not the end of working on the >>> technical content of the draft, but it is actually the starting >>> point when the WG has full change control about the content of the >>> draft! >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Martin Stiemerling >>> Transport Area Director >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tcpinc mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc >>> >>> >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Tcpinc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc >
_______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
