That's what I'm thinking. Mike
On Oct 20, 2010, at 6:28 PM, Heath Henderson wrote: > Yes, failure, but from the creative standpoint, it sure would be fun to try. > From the technical side (outside of the tech plan etc) it sure would be > challenging to try and get that system fixed back up right. Sounds like the > infrastructure is there though. > > -Heath Henderson > > On Oct 20, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Jason Livezey <jlive...@nlsd122.org> wrote: > >> It is going to be really hard for a Director if he or she can't touch >> anything. I have to manage things on a daily basis just so I can make an >> educated decision about what I need and who is going to manage it. >> Obviously something is seriously wrong with their setup if they have login >> times of 20+ minutes. That basically means those machines are useless... >> >> You would have to go backwards before you could go forward. With that >> current budget you could only spend about $7500K a building if you divided >> equally. With a district that big a budget like that for tech is just bad. >> >> Talk about setting up for failure... >> >> JL >> >> On Oct 20, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Delawder, Scott wrote: >> >>> Union District means no Hands on for the Director >> >> Jason Livezey >> Director of Technology >> New Lenox School District #122 >> Cell: 815.693.9338 >> >> ACMT Certified >> >> >> >> >> | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org | > | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org | | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
