Delawder,


I remember back in a former life....being a supervisor in a factory. All my
floor personnel was union....and I wasn't of course.  While I could go on
and on about what I know of that experience, I'll just say that I was less
than happy several times when I would go to do some labor because a person
was sick.  The politics of that whole situation superimposed onto the
politics already manifested for a Director who DOESN'T have to deal with
union subordinates, screams Rolaids.  Does the benefit package have some
sort of comprehensive care/life insurance for stress related illnesses,
mental or physical, that is sure to take the Director down?

I guess if that budget is all the district can do for their technology, the
new courageous soul taking on that load of a position should be allowed to
enlist the most diligent and creative grant writer that would find some tech
funds for that budget to upgrade that heaping pile of a collision domain.
While I believe that throwing money at something doesn't necessarily always
fix it....$300,000 a year for a tech budget of a school that size with the
problems it has.............- WOW!  Isn't that like an early/mid 90's
budget?



On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Mike Oliveri <
mike.oliv...@student.rb60.com> wrote:

> I'm wondering if they're talking to Cat. State Farm gives out old equipment
> in Bloomington, so I'm wondering if Cat does the same. They've got their big
> offices downtown and facilities all over the area.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> On Oct 21, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Richard Kasson wrote:
>
> > Let me get this straight.  The techs are all union so the tech director
> > can't touch the equipment?  That's the scariest part.  Does that budget
> > figure include the salaries or are salaries separate.  If salaries are
> > separate, you can get creative and make it work.  I manage on $25,000 a
> year
> > or less depending on what my REAP grant is and whether Congress continues
> to
> > fund it.  You just have to find and use available resources that provide
> > things for free.  There is absolutely no reason that those techs
> shouldn't
> > be visiting Rock Island arsenal on a regular basis to take advantage of
> what
> > the Army is rotating out of service.  There's some pretty nice two and
> > three-year-old equipment available.  All it takes is someone to fill out
> the
> > paperwork and watch the website.
> >
> > That login thing is a bit worrisome.  I had 9 year old Celeron 600s with
> 64
> > MB RAM that didn't take 20 minutes to login, even when we were a Novell
> > Network.  Something definitely ain't correct there.
> >
> > It does sound like a challenge and it would be a blast to give it a shot
> -
> > if I lived closer.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tech-geeks-boun...@tech-geeks.org
> > [mailto:tech-geeks-boun...@tech-geeks.org] On Behalf Of Mike Oliveri
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 7:08 PM
> > To: Tech-Geeks Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [tech-geeks] Job Opening - Dir of Tech
> >
> > That's what I'm thinking.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > On Oct 20, 2010, at 6:28 PM, Heath Henderson wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, failure, but from the creative standpoint, it sure would be fun to
> > try. From the technical side (outside of the tech plan etc) it sure would
> be
> > challenging to try and get that system fixed back up right. Sounds like
> the
> > infrastructure is there though.
> >>
> >> -Heath Henderson
> >>
> >> On Oct 20, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Jason Livezey <jlive...@nlsd122.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> It is going to be really hard for a Director if he or she can't touch
> > anything.  I have to manage things on a daily basis just so I can make an
> > educated decision about what I need and who is going to manage it.
> > Obviously something is seriously wrong with their setup if they have
> login
> > times of 20+ minutes.  That basically means those machines are useless...
> >>>
> >>> You would have to go backwards before you could go forward.   With that
> > current budget you could only spend about $7500K a building if you
> divided
> > equally.  With a district that big a budget like that for tech is just
> bad.
> >>>
> >>> Talk about setting up for failure...
> >>>
> >>> JL
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 20, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Delawder, Scott wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Union District means no Hands on for the Director
> >>>
> >>> Jason Livezey
> >>> Director of Technology
> >>> New Lenox School District #122
> >>> Cell: 815.693.9338
> >>>
> >>> ACMT Certified
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
> >> | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
> >
> > | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
> >
> > | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
>
> | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
>
| Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |

Reply via email to