> > The next node to see it assuming that that node isn't also transient > Um, if that next node is transient, wouldn't that preclude it from being the next node in the first place ? Apologies if the previous sentence doesn't make a whole lof ot sense, but you probably get what i'm trying to say :-) Kris _______________________________________________ freenet-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
- [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Kalle A. Sandstr\"om
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Michael Rogers
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Michael Rogers
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Tavin Cole
- RE: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mathew Ryden
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Kalle A. Sandstr\"om
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Kris Van Hulle
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mathew Ryden
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Kris Van Hulle
- RE: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mathew Ryden
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mathew Ryden
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Shu Yan Chan
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mr . Bad
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Michael Rogers
