>===== Original Message From "Kris Van Hulle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ===== >> >> The next node to see it assuming that that node isn't also transient >> >Um, if that next node is transient, wouldn't that preclude it from >being the next node in the first place ? >Apologies if the previous sentence doesn't make a whole lof ot >sense, but you probably get what i'm trying to say :-) > >Kris > There's a possiblity, because you can manually tell nodes about each other, so you could set up a network of transient nodes that all have each other in their nodes.config if you wanted... not that I can think of a good use for that. -- Benjamin Coates _______________________________________________ freenet-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Michael Rogers
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Michael Rogers
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Tavin Cole
- RE: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mathew Ryden
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Kalle A. Sandstr\"om
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Kris Van Hulle
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mathew Ryden
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Kris Van Hulle
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mathew Ryden
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mathew Ryden
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Shu Yan Chan
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mr . Bad
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Michael Rogers
