On 26 Apr 2001, at 11:04, Mathew Ryden wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kris Van Hulle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > The next node to see it assuming that that node isn't also transient > > > > > Um, if that next node is transient, wouldn't that preclude it from > > being the next node in the first place ? > > Not necessarily, but usually, yes. > Not necessarily ? Um, I though that transient nodes didnt't give their IP to anybody, so how can an insert or something go through that node, when nobody is supposed to know it ? I mean, that is the entire point of being transient, right ? _______________________________________________ freenet-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
- [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Kalle A. Sandstr\"om
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Michael Rogers
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Michael Rogers
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Tavin Cole
- RE: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mathew Ryden
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Kalle A. Sandstr\"om
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Kris Van Hulle
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mathew Ryden
- RE: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Kris Van Hulle
- RE: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mathew Ryden
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mathew Ryden
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Shu Yan Chan
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Mr . Bad
- Re: [freenet-tech] Freenet backbone? Michael Rogers
