> > So hi, and if there's anybody else looking at this code, please get in > > touch. I hope I'll be able to fix the problems of the device sleeping > > in mutexed code. If there is a high likelihood that this code will > > soon be removed from the tree, that would be nice to know too. Maybe I > > could change that. > > There is a sentiment among some developers that the current code is > too network heavy.
Concur. > Perhaps it should look more like the usb code. Concur. > But the existing code shouldn't go anywhere until there is a > replacement, and I don't think there are any yet. So fixes to the > existing code would be welcome. Concur. But it won't get enabled, even with bug fixes. Making it better requires a bigger effort. However, ones you get part way along the line you might see "oh, lower level abstration good". If you get to that point, and make the next steps forward, you'll be a hero.
