> > Making it better requires a bigger effort. However, ones you get part > > way along the line you might see "oh, lower level abstration good". > > If you get to that point, and make the next steps forward, you'll be a > > hero. > > > > Thanks. I've received several helpful comments and contributions from > others who are interested in this, but I appreciate the broad > delineation of what experienced OpenBSD developers view as an > acceptable standard for kernel device driver subsystem code. Thanks > for the encouragement. I'll continue to study the USB code Ted > recommends as a good model.
Whoa. I think USB was just called a good model. Good? I'm not sure on that point. A better idea for a model? Yeah, kind of like much less worse.
