On 13/07/2013, Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> wrote: > > Whoa. I think USB was just called a good model. > > Good? I'm not sure on that point. A better idea for a model? Yeah, > kind of like much less worse. >
I'll readily study any better model. But let's be realistic. I've already started studying USB and I'm prepared to apply any useful principles I find there in future code that may be submitted to OpenBSD. If there is a good argument for further development of Bluetooth in OpenBSD, in any case, it won't just be my enthusiasm.
