On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 02:52:02AM +0100, Tony Sidaway wrote: > On 13/07/2013, Theo de Raadt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Whoa. I think USB was just called a good model. > > > > Good? I'm not sure on that point. A better idea for a model? Yeah, > > kind of like much less worse. > > > > I'll readily study any better model. But let's be realistic. I've > already started studying USB and I'm prepared to apply any useful > principles I find there in future code that may be submitted to > OpenBSD. If there is a good argument for further development of > Bluetooth in OpenBSD, in any case, it won't just be my enthusiasm.
I think one of the main points is that netbt is behaving like a network stack even though it is not. The result is a strange network layer and to some extents abuse of network resurces for something that is not network related -- using mbufs as a buffer backend comes to mind. -- :wq Claudio
