On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:55:10AM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:37:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > It's about "You cannot change the licence without consent of the author" and
> > "We just assume that you say yes to this because we dont care about your
> > rights", which is morally and legally wrong.
> 
> 
> It's very simple. Four words.
> 
> "Silence is not consent."
> 
> Not in contracts. Not in sex. And not in licensing.
> 

This is the clearest description of the situation.
Sadly, "clear" is something the OpenSSL folks are unfamiliar with...

-- 
Gilles Chehade

https://www.poolp.org                                          @poolpOrg

Reply via email to