On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:55:10AM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:37:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > It's about "You cannot change the licence without consent of the author" and
> > "We just assume that you say yes to this because we dont care about your
> > rights", which is morally and legally wrong.
> It's very simple. Four words.
> "Silence is not consent."
> Not in contracts. Not in sex. And not in licensing.

This is the clearest description of the situation.
Sadly, "clear" is something the OpenSSL folks are unfamiliar with...

Gilles Chehade

https://www.poolp.org                                          @poolpOrg

Reply via email to