Pranam Sir Shri SKBji I do not understand; every question may have an answer ; but we may not be aware of it; if am asked, I would invite more angels to stand one upon another; ignorance is revealed if they are cover ups too; so atom ,quanta, entangle all jargons are explainable if micro can be explained. And why and who is not practicing humility here?. Never mind sir. As a scientist even you may have an answer. Thank you K R IRS 3321
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 18:05, Sithamalli Balasubramanian < [email protected]> wrote: > This is as good as asking "How many angels can stand on a square foot of > land." There is no answer. There are many cover-ups for ignorance. Let us > practice humility. > Skb. > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 16:09, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> pRANAM >> Had a jab 1 over; quantum entanglement 2 only after 28 days; so just >> opened and saw the straight question quantum entanglement. Sri SKBji sir >> said he does not like the word quanta; because it is as imaginary as a >> binomial theorem and the true but confusing E=MC2; on the outset, I am >> editing to present as short as possible from 345 pages of my notes , >> filtered to 23 pages and trying to reduce still; may release next week; >> this is elaborating the right dot perception of Sri YM on CONSCIOUSNESS >> done a few days back. When we say that so for the entire science was >> expanded in samskritham long ago as verses to learn as poem, know a meaning >> superficially; then learn to deduce the meaning in depth. What I am trying >> is such analysis rendered already in our scriptures crossing the >> quantum entanglement; or else ESR theory would not have arisen nor bell's >> inequality; Bohr, Schrodinger all said that Indian Upanishads explored the >> quantum jump and entanglements in mundaka Upanishad itself; >> 2 2 10 Mundaka II, Khanda II >> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/mundaka-upanishad-shankara-bhashya/d/doc145109.html> >> न तत्र सूर्यो भाति न चन्द्रतारकं नेमा विद्युतो भान्ति कुतोऽयमग्निः । >> तमेव भान्तमनुभाति सर्वं तस्य भासा सर्वमिदं विभाति ॥ १० ॥ >> >> na tatra sūryo bhāti na candratārakaṃ nemā vidyuto bhānti kuto'yamagniḥ | >> tameva bhāntamanubhāti sarvaṃ tasya bhāsā sarvamidaṃ vibhāti || 10 || >> >> 10. The sun shines not there, nor the moon and the stars. Nor do these >> lightnings shine. How could this fire? All shine after him who shines. All >> this is illumined by his radiance. >> >> Verse 2.2.11 Mundaka II, Khanda II >> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/mundaka-upanishad-shankara-bhashya/d/doc145109.html> >> ब्रह्मैवेदममृतं पुरस्ताद्ब्रह्म पश्चाद्ब्रह्म दक्षिणतश्चोत्तरेण । >> अधश्चोर्ध्वं च प्रसृतं ब्रह्मैवेदं विश्वमिदं वरिष्ठम् ॥ ११ ॥ >> >> brahmaivedamamṛtaṃ purastādbrahma paścādbrahma dakṣiṇataścottareṇa | >> adhaścordhvaṃ ca prasṛtaṃ brahmaivedaṃ viśvamidaṃ variṣṭham || 11 || >> >> 11. All this before is immortal *Brahman*; certainly all behind is >> *Brahman*; all to the south and to the north; all bellow and all alone >> stretched out, *i.e.*, extended, all this is certainly *Brahman*, the >> highest. >> >> Verse 3.1.1 Mundaka III, Khanda I >> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/mundaka-upanishad-shankara-bhashya/d/doc145121.html> >> द्वा सुपर्णा सयुजा सखाया समानं वृक्षं परिषस्वजाते । तयोरन्यः पिप्पलं >> स्वाद्वत्त्यनश्नन्नन्यो अभिचाकशीति ॥ १ ॥ >> >> dvā suparṇā sayujā sakhāyā samānaṃ vṛkṣaṃ pariṣasvajāte | tayoranyaḥ >> pippalaṃ svādvattyanaśnannanyo abhicākaśīti || 1 || >> >> 1. Two inseparable companions of fine plumage perch on the self-same >> tree. One of the two feeds on the delicious fruit. The other not tasting of >> it looks on. >> >> 3 1 1 Two birds entangled same phenomena soul one Jeevatma another >> Paramatma distanced and closely; one eats another observes; one does not >> do anything and the other does; one acting in one axis in one direction; >> and the other in the negative strides; at a time both cannot be perceived >> even >> if one is measured by wave and color still any one only is visible; its a >> stretch as a quantum entanglement. The Brahmam is behind; to the south, to >> the north all below and all stretched out; extended. wave or particle >> travelling at speeds unnoticeable. There is no sun moon or starts nor the >> lightnings How could theer be the light illumined?. B G raises a similar >> one. Brahadaranyaka amd Hatho does that. all arose from the rig vedam >> Nasadiya suktham. Now i stop. I am trying also whether quantum and >> entanglement could be described as a story so that other than few of us >> many may understand and connecting to our scriptures. I need not do >> anything. Already the elders of our land as well as the world scientists >> had done that. spooky it is. K R IRS 3321 >> >> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 12:32, Yeddanapudi Markandeyulu < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> What about quantum entanglement? >>> YM >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:17 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Pranam >>>> Science always writes like the present media; the media writes or >>>> speaks for 30 minutes on the address to contact, without revealing all the >>>> time, and at the end forgetting to tell. So too the science of today. They >>>> talk tall but add in between subjects, cannot be sure, may need more etc >>>> etc and why would they present a paper at all? All the if and buts I could >>>> read there. Techyon they say but say went into darkness; einstein said and >>>> not said etc. But I am certain that we said it long ago that there are many >>>> spheres, space, darkness, suns and moons, objects that could travel faster >>>> than 186000 miles per second etc. And the west refuse to accept and raise >>>> their vocal chord and finally end it with the if and buts. They say at the >>>> end: “Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No >>>> matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always got there >>>> first, and is waiting for it.” So they know darkness can travel faster >>>> than the light. And unless the black hole has the negative energy and speed >>>> faster than the light, what went in or at least the light shall emit out >>>> but it is not so. And HE is GOD only because he is the light and the >>>> Darkness (all the positive and negative aspects are HIS) ; and nasadiya >>>> suktham was clear about it even if T H Griffith translation is bad; also >>>> ESWARA CHANDRA VIDYASAGAR AS A kid proved the existence of the god only >>>> like that; when I said nasthi contained the asthi some member made fun of >>>> me. That is the truth. Pususha and the prakruthi Maya are one and the same. >>>> Only because he is the darkness can travel faster than light and show the >>>> light to wait; what he can do or not HE need not prove the fragile humanity >>>> but it is vice-versa only. The late Dawkins admitted the impracticality of >>>> the singularity theory which is a rightful admission of change. K R IRS >>>> 1321 >>>> >>>> On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 09:53, Rangarajan T.N.C. <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> https://theconversation.com/can-the-laws-of-physics-disprove-god-146638 >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoocPWsxfoygbuJrpKdHz1%3DYFydFcocWr1o%3DhbQw1Btv8A%40mail.gmail.com >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoocPWsxfoygbuJrpKdHz1%3DYFydFcocWr1o%3DhbQw1Btv8A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "iyer123" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL5XZopkx8D_37z6pSpMOSf9cA7OjqjjaPz5HsmbaBKUw_dA9w%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL5XZopkx8D_37z6pSpMOSf9cA7OjqjjaPz5HsmbaBKUw_dA9w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "iyer123" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAOSW9WtQbQ_uY6OrSHp02rGCGz98nTLzxKDi46x-yLKKVwDJQQ%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAOSW9WtQbQ_uY6OrSHp02rGCGz98nTLzxKDi46x-yLKKVwDJQQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoouksc0Z4%2B7Pi0YdUL9kzSV5DdaP4jLVfPJH8ZiA%3D8oTA%40mail.gmail.com.
