Thank you for your extreme thanks giving for all things done so far; as I told you I never do anything; nandrum theethum pirar thara vaara; after all your words if hurted you , it is my misfortune indeed; where indirect and direct taxes are not levied, CBDT does not interfere in anyone's affairs; thank you for the average relishments and highly appreciate your pruning hearings. Thanks again K R to LNS 123 upto infinity group and others
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 17:03, Laxminarayan Sarma < [email protected]> wrote: > Most Respected Brahmasri Rajaram Krishnamurthy, IRS, *123* to *Infinity* > avargaley thank you for so obligingly spelling my name and surname the way > it should be spelled. However do me another favor: kindly oblige me by > de-fusing my name from my surname > Please do me another favour: kindly keep me out of your puerile mud-sling > match because I want none of it > > I strongly feel, no, I am sure you are averse to receiving even genuine > positives as can be evidenced from your derisive contemptuous reference to > my innocuous use of *kings English or queen's English *in paying > compliments to you. > > Once again, please cease making personal allusions to me. The wise step > will be in your own interest > > > > > > > , > please keep me out of your mud-sling > > > > On Fri, 18 Aug, 2023, 2:31 pm Rajaram Krishnamurthy, < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Sure colLaxminarayansarmaji. However issues I have told already do crop >> up when punches are formed by yourself. Do exclaim your friends by name; >> but writing Nethas etc do not point to them. So write boldly and take it >> back . What you pay so you receive sir. I never start anything but I do not >> allow weeds to grow under my feet. Even now you have not stated why seeking >> annas ,on a certain topic, remained silent even after seeing a part reply. >> So whereas the letters say neutral, punches are passed with favouritism. As >> long as you treat it as strict business I do not bother . So be may it be >> Whether Queen or King English sir Thank you KR IRS 18 823 >> >> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 11:39, Laxminarayan Sarma < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> KR-ji , you've now turned your guns at me. Never mind. I shall take >>> every whiplash from a lesrned, senior scholar like you as a lesson, a >>> blessing. >>> >>> But, with due respect, my knowledge of and command over the Queen's >>> English (now King's English), as compared to yours, is rudimentary, almost >>> non-existent. As to my felicity with the keyboard of my Android, it is >>> lousy. Yiu will definitely appreciate that a hand that has wielded guns, >>> cannot be as delicate and supple as the one that has wielded high-end >>> pens...so it's obvious that I'm guilty of typos. >>> >>> *But i take care of one thing: spelling of names. The biggest indignity, >>> disrespect and insult you can inflict on a man is mis-spelling his name. >>> >>> You're an erudite scholar treading the path of brahma shastras; not an >>> ordinary, uncouth, barely educated like me. Would respectfully suggest if >>> you please spare a few precious seconds of your precious time, you will >>> notice that i spell my surname *WITHOUT* an *H *! It is soelt *S-A-R-M-A >>> NOT * S-*H*-A-R-M-A >>> >>> *I sincerely trust you will kindly condescend to do me a great favour by >>> spelling my name correctly in your highly erudite scholarly treatisez that >>> you so obligingly post in the forum for the enlightment, education, >>> edification and, at times, entertainment of lesser mortals like this most >>> humble servant of yours* >>> >>> *Col. Laxminarayan SaRMA* >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 18 Aug, 2023, 10:10 am Rajaram Krishnamurthy, < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I am ADDRESSING THIS IN RESPONSE TO LAKSHMINARAYANA SHARMAJI's satvika >>>> request. I ack but Mr Sharmaji are you doing this unilaterally or >>>> bilaterally? Impartially or partially? Is it because having read the whole >>>> episodes , right from the beginning, you felt your Annas are so honest >>>> purushas who are insulted by me or you feel that they can do anything but I >>>> have to remain silent? Than nenjarivadhu poyyarkka. When you wrote "NETAs >>>> should you not remember it does apply to you also sir? So if I write a 3rd >>>> rate material, keemayanam of Annadurai, will you all reply calmly without >>>> getting incited? Do not be smart as smarthas are long dead. Non-Niyathas >>>> cannot comment about the nethas. Do not worship humans; what bhagavatam >>>> speaks about how one dwija shaall react is: Mata pita guru deivam are >>>> worshipful; but throw them off if they go against the dharma and Vedas. If >>>> you refer you will find it by yourself. If you refer to your email when >>>> you wrote :"netha", can you spell properly the few words you wrote there? >>>> I am not at all jibing at you sir; I ignored them as it is common for all; >>>> but here I brought iti to your attention to explain the fellow to whom you >>>> are trying to defend here, writes such nonsense jibings but gets wild when >>>> cornered as his level is shallow, but I cannot pass as someone shall act as >>>> police or else thieves will plunder. Why did he not write about your wrong >>>> spellings?; because you are GOD? ; NO ; pancha tantra; even at 79 and 97. >>>> If your 88 wants to join them pl do so but be prepared to share the booty >>>> sir. You wrote one similar to your anna and what you got back and went >>>> silent. One who knows that he does not know is better. If you would like >>>> the relationship of Moodan and moorgan and the crocodiles as close, please >>>> have them and have a taste . But unless you are neutral and courageous >>>> enough to shut out all fronts please do not disturb annas. Have courage to >>>> fight then you are a Brahmin. Or else think so and lead your life in >>>> silence. Thank you sir KR IRS 18 8 23 >>>> >>>> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 22:01, Laxminarayan Sarma < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear RK , Loved your write-up. You write well .But would it be too >>>>> much to ask far if i request you to kindly confine to the subject . Not >>>>> detract from it by bringing in references to anybody. And, for heaven's >>>>> sake, please stop being disrespectful toeards the venerable 97 year old >>>>> gentleman..It goes against the tenets of Sanatana Dharma. The elderly >>>>> gentleman is a Father Figure to most of us, seen and experienced more of >>>>> the world. Regardless of snything, I would take it in my stride every >>>>> uttersnce of such an elderly gentleman as a blessing. That is what my >>>>> ancestors, my elders and my peers have yaught me. And i always abide by >>>>> what i have imbibed as part of my upbringing and culture. >>>>> >>>>> So, sir, kindly hold your horses.. Words spoken in haste will cause us >>>>> to repent at leisure. >>>>> >>>>> With respectful regards >>>>> >>>>> Laxminarayan >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 17 Aug, 2023, 6:33 pm 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123, < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Respected Mr Rajaram, >>>>>> >>>>>> You may have hatred and anger, show it to your family members, not >>>>>> on me. >>>>>> >>>>>> It would not take much time to call you an idiot and fool. >>>>>> >>>>>> But my culture does not permit to call you so. *You have no culture >>>>>> at all. You are unfit to be called a former IRS. * >>>>>> >>>>>> *Next time you get anger show it your family members*. They will >>>>>> retard to you, at least ten times you are using including your grand >>>>>> kids. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is an upper limit to one's patience. Are you not ashamed to >>>>>> lower down to call another idiot and fool? Shame on you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Gopalakrishan >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, 17 August, 2023 at 01:33:57 pm IST, Rajaram >>>>>> Krishnamurthy <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As usual when Gopalakrishnan blabbers, and Narayanasamy naragal >>>>>> abuses without any knowledge of the subject, they will write either one >>>>>> to >>>>>> one or within iyer 123 with few members, out of which a few in >>>>>> conglomeration of their out focussed company. Gopalakrishnan always >>>>>> floundered down below the earth as he knew the route very well as he >>>>>> alone >>>>>> distinguished where is earth and where is hell south etc. That >>>>>> Gopalkrishna fool of an Ass did not understand, whether nachiketa going >>>>>> to >>>>>> hell is written by Narayanasamy or myself. That senile idiot of Singapore >>>>>> at 97 cannot distinguish the foreign on earth and the rest travel in >>>>>> space. >>>>>> For that Kid anything outside his bed is foreign so maybe it is. Hello >>>>>> Gopala, I know your knowledge is shallow. But your write up below south >>>>>> etc >>>>>> you should have learnt better. Where is the earth? Below Moon or SUN? >>>>>> Gopalakrishnan this map is for you ; find out up or down this earth where >>>>>> you live before going to foreign[below the earth]: >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you know directions in space? [image: image.png] >>>>>> Kathopanishad etymology >>>>>> >>>>>> Katha (Sanskrit: कठ) literally means "distress". Katha is also the >>>>>> name of a sage, credited as the founder of a branch of the Krishna >>>>>> Yajur-veda, as well as the term for a female pupil or follower of Kathas >>>>>> school of Yajurveda. Katha Upanishad uses words that symbolically embed >>>>>> and >>>>>> creatively have multiple meanings. For example, a closely pronounced word >>>>>> *Katha* (Sanskrit: कथा) literally means "story, legend, >>>>>> conversation, speech, tale" All of these related meanings are relevant to >>>>>> the Katha Upanishad. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nachiketa, the boy and a central character in the Katha Upanishad >>>>>> legend, similarly, has closely related words with roots and meanings >>>>>> relevant to the text. The language Sanskrit, suggests *Na- kṣiti* >>>>>> and *Na- aksiyete*, which are word plays of and pronounced similar >>>>>> to Nachiketa, means "non-decay, or what does not decay", a meaning that >>>>>> is >>>>>> relevant to second boon portion of the Nachiketa story. Similarly, *Na- >>>>>> jiti* is another word play and means "that which cannot be >>>>>> vanquished", which is contextually relevant to the Nachiketa's third >>>>>> boon. Another variation to Nachiketa, with etymological roots that is >>>>>> relevant to Katha Upanishad: the word *Na-ciketa* also means "I do >>>>>> not know, or he does not know". Some of these Sanskrit word plays are >>>>>> incorporated within the Upanishads text. >>>>>> >>>>>> Like Taittiriya Upanishad of Yajurveda, each section of the Katha >>>>>> Upanishad is called a *Valli* (वल्ली), which literally means a >>>>>> medicinal vine <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vine>-like climbing >>>>>> plant that grows independently yet is attached to a main tree. This >>>>>> symbolic terminology is apt and likely reflects the root and nature of >>>>>> the >>>>>> Upanishads in Black Yajur Veda, which too is largely independent of the >>>>>> liturgical Yajur Veda, and is attached to the main text. THUS, HOW THE >>>>>> ELDERS INTERPRETED KATHOPANISHAD CAN BE SEEN FROM BANARSIDAS >>>>>> PUBLICATIONS. >>>>>> Out of wits in foreign land and those who think up and down to earth are >>>>>> foreign, will learn how a foreign mind can think from the elders’’ notes. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Upanishad opens with the story of Vajasravasa, also >>>>>> called *Aruni Auddalaki Gautama*, who gives away all his worldly >>>>>> possessions. However, his son Nachiketa (Sanskrit: नचिकेता) sees the >>>>>> charitable >>>>>> sacrifice as a farce, because all those worldly things have already >>>>>> been used to exhaustion, and are of no value to the recipients. The cows >>>>>> given away, for example, were so old that they had >>>>>> 'drank-their-last-water' >>>>>> (पीतोदकाः), 'eaten-their-last-grass' (जग्धतृणाः), 'don't give milk' ( >>>>>> दुग्धदोहाः), 'who are barren' (निरिन्द्रियाः). {KR All these words >>>>>> fit those think interpreting foreigners} [peethodaga, jagatthruna, >>>>>> nirindriya etc] Concerned, the son asks his father, >>>>>> >>>>>> "Dear father, to whom will you give me away?" >>>>>> He said it a second, and then a third time. >>>>>> The father, seized by anger, replied: "To Death, I give you away." >>>>>> >>>>>> — Nachiketa, Katha Upanishad, 1.1.1-1.1.4 >>>>>> [image: image.png][image: image.png] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [image: image.png] >>>>>> >>>>>> Kasmai mam dasyaSEETHI? IS THE QUESTION OF Nachiketa. >>>>>> >>>>>> Mrthyeva tva datam iti. >>>>>> >>>>>> HE IS GIVEN AS DATHAM BY FATHER TO YAMA; MEANING AS ANOTHER DEAD >>>>>> WOOD AS NACHIKETA THOUGHT THAT HIS FATHER IS GIVING AS GIFT ALL OLD USED >>>>>> ARTICLES. NACHIKETA DID NOT GO TO A FOREIGN AS DEFINED BY THE N AND G >>>>>> FOR COMMERCIAL >>>>>> PURPOSE; HE WAS THROWN OUT AS OLD ARTICLE AS GIFT BY HIS FATHER. >>>>>> >>>>>> So karka kasadara and then write K R IRS 17 8 23 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 11:45, gopala krishnan <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Respected sir, >>>>>> >>>>>> On 15th August when he wrote Too my friends, and when I pointed out >>>>>> that it must be to , Mr Rajaram gave justification for using Too in his >>>>>> response.Similarly for use of lose instead of lost he will respond with >>>>>> *justification >>>>>> for using lose*. >>>>>> >>>>>> "travelling through *space *from bhoolokam to yamalokam?" - he has >>>>>> wrote. As per concept in Hinduism I understand Yamalokam is beneath the >>>>>> bhoolokam, how it will be above bhoolokam to travel through space? >>>>>> >>>>>> "Naraka (Sanskrit: नरक), also called Yamaloka, is the Hindu >>>>>> equivalent of Hell, where sinners are tormented after death. It is also >>>>>> the >>>>>> abode of Yama, the god of Death. It is described as located *in the >>>>>> south of the universe and beneath the earth*" as per *google search* >>>>>> >>>>>> How space comes to the picture? >>>>>> >>>>>> Gopalakrishnan. >>>>>> >>>>>> In addition some abusing as response to your questions. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, 17 August, 2023 at 11:11:44 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear folks >>>>>> >>>>>> According to his own flawed reasoning:- >>>>>> >>>>>> (1) did Nachiketass "lose caste" (whatever that idiotic phrase might >>>>>> mean) by travelling through space from bhoolokam to yamalokam? >>>>>> >>>>>> (2) did reprobate renegade blasphemer and unschooled uneducated >>>>>> master-fibber K RAJARAM ex-IRS 16 8 23 "lose caste" similarly by >>>>>> travelling from India to Californuia, USA, and "lose caste" again >>>>>> irretrievably by travelling to Hawaii? >>>>>> >>>>>> Can he honestly and without prevarication, evasion and lying answer >>>>>> the following questions:- >>>>>> >>>>>> (3) was he ever of the braahmana "caste" since he never underwent any >>>>>> of our samskaarams including jaatha karmam, naama karanam, >>>>>> anna-praashanam, >>>>>> chaulam, ear-piercimg, aayushya-homam, upanayanam, vivaaham? >>>>>> >>>>>> (4) did he or did he not condemn, despise, denigrate, insult, >>>>>> discredit all vaadhyaars without whom he could not have any of these >>>>>> samskaarams performed? >>>>>> >>>>>> (5) has he ever heard of the kriya called the vichinnaagni santhaanam? >>>>>> >>>>>> (6) does he know why, by whom, and how it is performed? >>>>>> >>>>>> (7) did he marry according to the rules prescribed for Brahmins and >>>>>> Hindus, involving the sapthapadi circumambulation of the agni, or did he >>>>>> do >>>>>> a prosaic civil act before a government officer such as an assistant >>>>>> registrar or a registrar and proceed to consummation? >>>>>> >>>>>> (8) does he know what is the "naandi" ritual performed before >>>>>> upanayanam, vivaaham, shraaddham, shashti-abda-poorthi, and >>>>>> sathabhishekam? >>>>>> >>>>>> (9) does he know by whom and for whom and why is it performed? >>>>>> >>>>>> (10) does he know what is agnihothram? >>>>>> >>>>>> (11) if so, which has he performed, and on what occasion? >>>>>> >>>>>> S Narayanaswamy Iyer >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:42 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Section IX - Meditation on the Vaisvanavara Fire >>>>>> >>>>>> Chapter V >>>>>> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-brihadaranyaka-upanishad/d/doc122185.html> >>>>>> *Verse >>>>>> 5.9.1: Brahadaranyaka Upanishad* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Kathopanishad Vaishvanaram verse of Nachiketa speaks about the >>>>>> yagnam the Vedic must perform, connecting his soul to the fire agni @ >>>>>> Vaisnavara=human Agni. Vedam oduvarrkku ore mazhai means the strict >>>>>> vediyar >>>>>> addicted to being a Brahmin. The Vaishvanaran who begets th fire on the >>>>>> Brahma yagnam, must preserve it till death when his atman gets purified >>>>>> by >>>>>> that Agni. Hence Crossing the ocean is prohibited for the tri varnas and >>>>>> especially to the true Brahmin. >>>>>> >>>>>> The prohibition is clearly stated in several scriptures. The >>>>>> Baudhayana Sutra, one of the Hindu Dharma Shastras, says that “making >>>>>> voyages by sea” (II.1.2.2) is an offense which will cause pataniya, >>>>>> loss of caste. It offers a rather difficult penance: “They shall eat >>>>>> every fourth mealtime a little food, bathe at the time of the three >>>>>> libations (morning, noon and evening), passing the day standing and the >>>>>> night sitting. After the lapse of three years, they throw off their >>>>>> guilt.” >>>>>> Harsha Ramamurthy in his erudite article on the issue, explains that, >>>>>> according to Baudhayana Sutra, the highest authority in deciding a >>>>>> question >>>>>> of dharma is shruti, our primary scriptures, the Vedas and Agamas. Next >>>>>> is >>>>>> the smriti, the secondary scriptures, which include the Dharma Shastras. >>>>>> Third is sampradaya, the teachings and practices of a specific lineage. >>>>>> He >>>>>> concludes, “ because of the bans in smriti and sampradaya, such travel is >>>>>> considered a banned activity.” He added that the ban applies to all three >>>>>> upper castes, and not just brahmins. It also applies to sannyasins, >>>>>> who–in >>>>>> his tradition–can only be from the brahmin caste. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why the ban? >>>>>> >>>>>> In the Baudhayana Sutra, the ban is discussed in the context of a >>>>>> description of the geographical limits of India which concludes that >>>>>> within >>>>>> its boundary “spiritual pre-eminence is found.” Generally, two reasons >>>>>> are >>>>>> given by scholars for the ban. The first is that it is impossible to >>>>>> maintain one’s required daily religious observances on a ship, >>>>>> particularly >>>>>> thrice-daily personal worship. The second is that one will incur the sin >>>>>> of >>>>>> mlecchas samparka, usually politely translated as mixing with foreigners. >>>>>> Mlecchas, however, is more accurately translated as “barbarian” or >>>>>> “savage.” “I am told,” he said, “that there is a penance to be performed >>>>>> when a sannyasin or priest crosses the ocean. The existence of this >>>>>> penance >>>>>> shows that as per the need and their own deeper vision, a sannyasin or >>>>>> priest can cross the ocean to preserve and make his mother religion >>>>>> flourish. *But this should not be done for any materialistic need.”* >>>>>> >>>>>> Dr. A.V. Ramana Dikshitulu, head priest of the Balaji Temple in >>>>>> Tirumala, one of India’s most respected and popular pilgrimage >>>>>> destinations, said, “None of our priests who serve in the main sanctum >>>>>> can >>>>>> cross the ocean. Neither I nor any member of my family have done so, >>>>>> despite lucrative offers from abroad. Serving the Lord here is most >>>>>> important to us. The Balaji Temple is governed by the Vaikhanasa Agama. >>>>>> It >>>>>> says that the people outside India are akin to mlecchas, barbarians, who >>>>>> do >>>>>> not follow any rules or code of conduct, and therefore it forbids >>>>>> visiting >>>>>> such places. These places have habits, food, relationships and other >>>>>> things >>>>>> which could make us corrupt and impure.” >>>>>> >>>>>> sunrise, midday and sunset, called trikal gayatri >>>>>> sandhya,” he explained. “*This trikal sandhya cannot be performed on >>>>>> a plane or ship; it must be done on the earth.” *Dr. Ramana >>>>>> Dikshitulu does not specifically rule out “crossing” an ocean, for he >>>>>> himself flies occasionally from Chennai to Kolkata, a flight which goes >>>>>> out >>>>>> over the Bay of Bengal. But as that flight is only two hours long, he >>>>>> does >>>>>> not miss his trikal sandhya as he would on a longer flight or a voyage by >>>>>> ship, and he does not land outside India. *He was unaware of any >>>>>> penance to offset crossing the ocean.* >>>>>> >>>>>> Clearly the Dharma Shastras’ ban on ocean travel was >>>>>> intended to maintain the religious strength and purity of the individual, >>>>>> and to prevent negative external influence from non-Hindu cultures. Other >>>>>> cultures had the same concern. One can note that the very word barbarian >>>>>> (used to translate mleccha with a strongly negative connotation), just >>>>>> meant “foreigner,” in the original Greek, yet came to describe an >>>>>> uncultured or brutish person. Baudhayana Sutra makes the point more than >>>>>> once to delineate ancient India’s boundaries and declare it a sacred land >>>>>> out of which one should not step >>>>>> >>>>>> * Hence Nachiketa Vaisvanara concept eduvated by Dharma Raja >>>>>> applied to Brahmins who did not cross the ocean and for such alone ore >>>>>> mazhai is possible. Brahadaranyaka Upanishad states as under: * >>>>>> >>>>>> अयमाग्निर्वैश्वानरो योऽयमन्तः पुरुषे, येनेदमन्नं पच्यते यदिदमद्यते; >>>>>> तस्यैष घोषो भवति यमेतत्कर्णावपिधाय शृणोति; स यदोत्क्रमिष्यन्भवति नैनं >>>>>> घोषं शृणोति ॥ १ ॥ >>>>>> इति नवमं ब्राह्मणम् ॥ >>>>>> >>>>>> ayamāgnirvaiśvānaro yo'yamantaḥ puruṣe, yenedamannaṃ pacyate >>>>>> yadidamadyate; tasyaiṣa ghoṣo bhavati yametatkarṇāvapidhāya śṛṇoti; sa >>>>>> yadotkramiṣyanbhavati nainaṃ ghoṣaṃ śṛṇoti || 1 || >>>>>> iti navamaṃ brāhmaṇam || >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. This fire that is within a man and digests the food that is >>>>>> eaten, is Vaiśvānara. It emits this sound that one hears by stopping the >>>>>> ears thus. When a man is about to leave the body, he no more hears this >>>>>> sound. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is another meditation like the preceding ones. *This fire is >>>>>> Vaiśvānara.* Which fire? This *that* is *within a man.* Is it the >>>>>> element fire that is one of the components of the body? No, it is the one >>>>>> called Vaiśvānara, which *digests the food.* Which food? The food *that >>>>>> is eaten* by men. That is to say, the heat in the stomach. For >>>>>> direct sign of it the text says: As that fire digests the food, *it >>>>>> emits this sound. *What is it? *That one hears by stopping the ears >>>>>> thus,* with one’s fingers. The word ‘Etat’ is an adverb (meaning >>>>>> ‘thus’). One should meditate upon that fire as Vaiśvānara, or Virāj. Here >>>>>> too the result is identification with it. Incidentally a death omen is >>>>>> being described: *(When a man,* the experiencer in this body *is >>>>>> about to leave the body, he no more hears this sound*. >>>>>> >>>>>> K RAJARAM IRS 16 8 23 >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> On Facebook, please join >>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust >>>>>> >>>>>> We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join >>>>>> >>>>>> Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup >>>>>> >>>>>> Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : >>>>>> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust >>>>>> >>>>>> Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: >>>>>> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "KeralaIyers" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZorKvXymajQYXU7E%2BtfBBeqNGF8Q9J54mJ7CLJNw4AYMKg%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZorKvXymajQYXU7E%2BtfBBeqNGF8Q9J54mJ7CLJNw4AYMKg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "iyer123" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhNQOe5bicsZkoGQhVXTJLowEAK-ckvuohdO198CjOmbog%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhNQOe5bicsZkoGQhVXTJLowEAK-ckvuohdO198CjOmbog%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "iyer123" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/1048300645.806149.1692277413432%40mail.yahoo.com >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/1048300645.806149.1692277413432%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoo2Dgi33ymY1Ftcm2%3D%2BkPzG88y70e1SzbkgGM5yQr_EgA%40mail.gmail.com.
