Great  But what one now is what one then was ; stating in the reverse is
hypocritic in my opinion Not in yours. You live your life and I live my
life. All lead lives out of psychic pressures only thanks again for the
revelations KR IRS 18 823

On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 19:31, Laxminarayan Sarma <
[email protected]> wrote:

> The subject of Taxes, for me, is as alien as amavasya is to Abdul Kader. I
> am averse to asserting, repeatedly flauntiing my professional credentials,
> rank , medals, and all that go with it. That's my private life, and i am
> sure, is of no consequence to anyone.
>
> So I'd not talk about machine guns and howitzers, recce and tegiment. I
> believe.One should be known for what one is, not for what one was. However
> high, mighty, whatever rank or fesignation however big
>
> On Fri, 18 Aug, 2023, 6:39 pm Rajaram Krishnamurthy, <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for your extreme thanks giving for all things done so far; as I
>> told you I never do anything; nandrum theethum pirar thara vaara; after all
>> your words if hurted you , it is my misfortune indeed; where indirect and
>> direct taxes are not levied, CBDT does not interfere in  anyone's affairs;
>> thank you for the average relishments and highly appreciate your pruning
>> hearings. Thanks again  K R to LNS 123 upto infinity group and others
>>
>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 17:03, Laxminarayan Sarma <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Most Respected Brahmasri Rajaram Krishnamurthy, IRS, *123* to *Infinity*
>>> avargaley thank you for so obligingly spelling my name and surname the way
>>> it should be spelled. However do me another favor: kindly oblige me by
>>> de-fusing my name from my surname
>>> Please do me another favour: kindly keep me out of your puerile
>>> mud-sling match because I want none of it
>>>
>>> I strongly feel, no, I am sure you are averse to receiving even genuine
>>> positives as can be evidenced from your  derisive contemptuous reference to
>>> my  innocuous use of  *kings English or queen's English *in paying
>>> compliments to you.
>>>
>>> Once again, please cease making personal allusions to me. The wise step
>>> will be in your own interest
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ,
>>> please keep me out of your mud-sling
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 18 Aug, 2023, 2:31 pm Rajaram Krishnamurthy, <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sure colLaxminarayansarmaji. However issues I have told already do crop
>>>> up when punches are formed by yourself. Do exclaim your friends by name;
>>>> but writing Nethas etc do not point to them. So write boldly and take it
>>>> back . What you pay so you receive sir. I never start anything but I do not
>>>> allow weeds to grow under my feet. Even now you have not stated why seeking
>>>> annas ,on a certain topic, remained silent even after seeing a part reply.
>>>> So whereas the letters say neutral, punches are passed with favouritism. As
>>>> long as you treat it as strict business I do not bother . So be may it be
>>>> Whether Queen or King English sir Thank you KR IRS 18 823
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 11:39, Laxminarayan Sarma <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> KR-ji  , you've now turned your guns at me. Never mind. I shall take
>>>>> every whiplash from a lesrned, senior scholar like  you as a lesson, a
>>>>> blessing.
>>>>>
>>>>> But, with due respect, my knowledge of and command over the Queen's
>>>>> English (now King's English), as compared to yours,  is rudimentary, 
>>>>> almost
>>>>> non-existent. As to my felicity with the keyboard of my Android, it is
>>>>> lousy. Yiu will definitely appreciate that a hand that has wielded guns,
>>>>> cannot be as delicate and supple as the one that has wielded high-end
>>>>> pens...so it's obvious that I'm guilty of typos.
>>>>>
>>>>> *But i take care of one thing: spelling of names. The biggest
>>>>> indignity, disrespect and insult you can inflict on a man is mis-spelling
>>>>> his name.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're an erudite scholar treading the path of brahma shastras; not an
>>>>> ordinary, uncouth, barely educated like me. Would respectfully suggest if
>>>>> you please spare a few precious seconds of your precious time, you will
>>>>> notice that i spell my surname *WITHOUT* an *H *! It is soelt *S-A-R-M-A
>>>>> NOT *  S-*H*-A-R-M-A
>>>>>
>>>>> *I sincerely trust you will kindly condescend to do me a great favour
>>>>> by spelling my name correctly in your highly erudite scholarly treatisez
>>>>> that you so obligingly post in the forum for the enlightment, education,
>>>>> edification and, at times, entertainment of lesser mortals like this most
>>>>> humble servant of yours*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Col. Laxminarayan SaRMA*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 18 Aug, 2023, 10:10 am Rajaram Krishnamurthy, <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am ADDRESSING THIS IN RESPONSE TO LAKSHMINARAYANA SHARMAJI's
>>>>>> satvika request. I ack but Mr Sharmaji are you doing this unilaterally or
>>>>>> bilaterally? Impartially or partially?  Is it because having read the 
>>>>>> whole
>>>>>> episodes , right from the beginning, you felt your Annas are so honest
>>>>>> purushas who are insulted by me or you feel that they can do anything 
>>>>>> but I
>>>>>> have to remain silent? Than nenjarivadhu poyyarkka. When you wrote "NETAs
>>>>>> should you not remember it does apply to you also sir? So if I write a 
>>>>>> 3rd
>>>>>> rate material, keemayanam of Annadurai, will you all reply calmly without
>>>>>> getting incited? Do not be smart as smarthas are long dead. Non-Niyathas
>>>>>> cannot comment about the nethas. Do not worship humans; what bhagavatam
>>>>>> speaks about how one dwija shaall react is: Mata pita guru deivam are
>>>>>> worshipful; but throw them off if they go against the dharma and Vedas.  
>>>>>> If
>>>>>> you refer you will find it by yourself. If you refer to your email when
>>>>>> you wrote :"netha", can you spell properly the few words you wrote there?
>>>>>>  I am not at all jibing at you sir; I ignored them as it is common for 
>>>>>> all;
>>>>>> but here I brought iti to your attention to explain the fellow to whom 
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> are trying to defend here, writes such nonsense jibings but gets wild 
>>>>>> when
>>>>>> cornered as his level is shallow, but I cannot pass as someone shall act 
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> police or else thieves will plunder. Why did he not write about your 
>>>>>> wrong
>>>>>> spellings?; because you are GOD? ; NO ; pancha tantra; even at 79 and 97.
>>>>>> If your 88 wants to join them pl do so but be prepared to share the booty
>>>>>> sir. You wrote one similar to your anna and what you got back and went
>>>>>> silent. One who knows that he does not know is better. If you would like
>>>>>> the relationship of Moodan and moorgan and the crocodiles as close, 
>>>>>> please
>>>>>> have them and have a taste . But unless you are neutral and courageous
>>>>>> enough to shut out all fronts please do not disturb annas. Have courage 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> fight then you are a Brahmin. Or else  think so and lead your life in
>>>>>> silence. Thank you sir KR IRS 18 8 23
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 22:01, Laxminarayan Sarma <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear RK , Loved your write-up. You write well .But would it be too
>>>>>>> much to ask far if i request you to kindly confine to the subject . Not
>>>>>>> detract from it by bringing in references to anybody. And, for heaven's
>>>>>>> sake, please stop being disrespectful toeards  the venerable 97 year old
>>>>>>> gentleman..It goes against the tenets of Sanatana Dharma. The elderly
>>>>>>> gentleman is a Father Figure to most of us, seen and experienced more of
>>>>>>> the world. Regardless of snything, I would take it in my stride every
>>>>>>> uttersnce of such an elderly gentleman as a blessing. That is what my
>>>>>>> ancestors, my elders and my peers have yaught me. And i always abide by
>>>>>>> what i have imbibed as part of my upbringing and culture.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, sir, kindly hold your horses.. Words spoken in haste will cause
>>>>>>> us to repent at leisure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With respectful regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Laxminarayan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Aug, 2023, 6:33 pm 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123, <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Respected Mr Rajaram,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You may have hatred and anger, show it to your family members, not
>>>>>>>> on me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It would not take much time to call you an idiot and fool.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But my culture does not permit to  call you so. *You have no
>>>>>>>> culture at all. You are unfit to be called a former IRS. *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Next time you get anger show it your family members*. They will
>>>>>>>> retard to you, at least ten times you are using including your grand 
>>>>>>>> kids.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is an upper limit to one's patience. Are you not ashamed to
>>>>>>>> lower down to call another idiot and fool? Shame on you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gopalakrishan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 17 August, 2023 at 01:33:57 pm IST, Rajaram
>>>>>>>> Krishnamurthy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As usual when Gopalakrishnan blabbers, and Narayanasamy naragal
>>>>>>>> abuses without any knowledge of the subject, they will write either 
>>>>>>>> one to
>>>>>>>> one or within iyer 123 with few members, out of which a few in
>>>>>>>> conglomeration of their out focussed company. Gopalakrishnan always
>>>>>>>> floundered down below the earth as he knew the route very well as he 
>>>>>>>> alone
>>>>>>>> distinguished where is earth and where is hell south etc.  That
>>>>>>>> Gopalkrishna fool of an Ass did not understand, whether nachiketa 
>>>>>>>> going to
>>>>>>>> hell is written by Narayanasamy or myself. That senile idiot of 
>>>>>>>> Singapore
>>>>>>>> at 97 cannot distinguish the foreign on earth and the rest travel in 
>>>>>>>> space.
>>>>>>>> For that Kid anything outside his bed is foreign so maybe it is. Hello
>>>>>>>> Gopala, I know your knowledge is shallow. But your write up below 
>>>>>>>> south etc
>>>>>>>> you should have learnt better. Where is the earth? Below Moon or SUN?
>>>>>>>> Gopalakrishnan this map is for you ; find out up or down this earth 
>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>> you live before going to foreign[below the earth]:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you know directions in space? [image: image.png]
>>>>>>>>          Kathopanishad etymology
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Katha (Sanskrit: कठ) literally means "distress". Katha is also the
>>>>>>>> name of a sage, credited as the founder of a branch of the Krishna
>>>>>>>> Yajur-veda, as well as the term for a female pupil or follower of 
>>>>>>>> Kathas
>>>>>>>> school of Yajurveda. Katha Upanishad uses words that symbolically 
>>>>>>>> embed and
>>>>>>>> creatively have multiple meanings. For example, a closely pronounced 
>>>>>>>> word
>>>>>>>> *Katha* (Sanskrit: कथा) literally means "story, legend,
>>>>>>>> conversation, speech, tale" All of these related meanings are relevant 
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> the Katha Upanishad.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nachiketa, the boy and a central character in the Katha Upanishad
>>>>>>>> legend, similarly, has closely related words with roots and meanings
>>>>>>>> relevant to the text. The language Sanskrit,  suggests *Na- kṣiti*
>>>>>>>>  and *Na- aksiyete*, which are word plays of and pronounced
>>>>>>>> similar to Nachiketa, means "non-decay, or what does not decay", a 
>>>>>>>> meaning
>>>>>>>> that is relevant to second boon portion of the Nachiketa story. 
>>>>>>>> Similarly, *Na-
>>>>>>>> jiti* is another word play and means "that which cannot be
>>>>>>>> vanquished", which is contextually relevant to the Nachiketa's third
>>>>>>>> boon. Another variation to Nachiketa, with etymological roots that is
>>>>>>>> relevant to Katha Upanishad: the word *Na-ciketa* also means "I do
>>>>>>>> not know, or he does not know". Some of these Sanskrit word plays are
>>>>>>>> incorporated within the Upanishads text.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Like Taittiriya Upanishad of Yajurveda, each section of the Katha
>>>>>>>> Upanishad is called a *Valli* (वल्ली), which literally means a
>>>>>>>> medicinal vine <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vine>-like climbing
>>>>>>>> plant that grows independently yet is attached to a main tree.
>>>>>>>> This symbolic terminology is apt and likely reflects the root and 
>>>>>>>> nature of
>>>>>>>> the Upanishads in Black Yajur Veda, which too is largely independent 
>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>> liturgical Yajur Veda, and is attached to the main text. THUS, HOW THE
>>>>>>>> ELDERS INTERPRETED KATHOPANISHAD CAN BE SEEN FROM BANARSIDAS 
>>>>>>>> PUBLICATIONS.
>>>>>>>> Out of wits in foreign land and those who think up and down to earth 
>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>> foreign, will learn how a foreign mind can think from the elders’’ 
>>>>>>>> notes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>           The Upanishad opens with the story of Vajasravasa, also
>>>>>>>> called *Aruni Auddalaki Gautama*, who gives away all his worldly
>>>>>>>> possessions. However, his son Nachiketa (Sanskrit: नचिकेता) sees
>>>>>>>> the charitable sacrifice as a farce, because all those worldly
>>>>>>>> things have already been used to exhaustion, and are of no value to the
>>>>>>>> recipients. The cows given away, for example, were so old that they had
>>>>>>>> 'drank-their-last-water' (पीतोदकाः), 'eaten-their-last-grass' (
>>>>>>>> जग्धतृणाः), 'don't give milk' (दुग्धदोहाः), 'who are barren' (
>>>>>>>> निरिन्द्रियाः). {KR All these words fit those think interpreting
>>>>>>>> foreigners} [peethodaga, jagatthruna, nirindriya etc] Concerned,
>>>>>>>> the son asks his father,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Dear father, to whom will you give me away?"
>>>>>>>> He said it a second, and then a third time.
>>>>>>>> The father, seized by anger, replied: "To Death, I give you away."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> — Nachiketa, Katha Upanishad, 1.1.1-1.1.4
>>>>>>>> [image: image.png][image: image.png]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [image: image.png]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kasmai mam dasyaSEETHI? IS THE QUESTION OF Nachiketa.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mrthyeva tva datam iti.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  HE IS GIVEN AS DATHAM BY FATHER TO YAMA; MEANING AS ANOTHER DEAD
>>>>>>>> WOOD AS NACHIKETA THOUGHT THAT HIS FATHER IS GIVING AS GIFT ALL OLD 
>>>>>>>> USED
>>>>>>>> ARTICLES. NACHIKETA DID NOT GO TO A FOREIGN AS DEFINED BY THE N AND G 
>>>>>>>> FOR COMMERCIAL
>>>>>>>> PURPOSE; HE WAS THROWN OUT AS OLD ARTICLE AS GIFT BY HIS FATHER.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>       So karka kasadara and then write K R IRS 17 8 23
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 11:45, gopala krishnan <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Respected sir,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 15th August when he wrote Too my friends, and when I pointed out
>>>>>>>> that it must be to , Mr Rajaram  gave justification for using Too in 
>>>>>>>> his
>>>>>>>> response.Similarly  for use of lose instead of lost he will respond 
>>>>>>>> with *justification
>>>>>>>> for using lose*.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "travelling through *space *from bhoolokam to yamalokam?" - he has
>>>>>>>> wrote. As per  concept in Hinduism I understand Yamalokam is beneath 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> bhoolokam, how it will be above bhoolokam to travel through space?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Naraka (Sanskrit: नरक), also called Yamaloka, is the Hindu
>>>>>>>> equivalent of Hell, where sinners are tormented after death. It is 
>>>>>>>> also the
>>>>>>>> abode of Yama, the god of Death. It is described as located *in
>>>>>>>> the south of the universe and beneath the earth*" as per *google
>>>>>>>> search*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How space comes to the picture?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gopalakrishnan.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In addition some abusing as response to your questions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 17 August, 2023 at 11:11:44 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear folks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> According to his own flawed reasoning:-
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (1) did Nachiketass "lose caste" (whatever that idiotic phrase
>>>>>>>> might mean) by travelling through space from bhoolokam to yamalokam?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (2) did reprobate renegade blasphemer and unschooled uneducated
>>>>>>>> master-fibber K RAJARAM  ex-IRS 16 8 23 "lose caste" similarly by
>>>>>>>> travelling from India to Californuia, USA, and "lose caste" again
>>>>>>>> irretrievably by travelling to Hawaii?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can he honestly and without prevarication, evasion and lying answer
>>>>>>>> the following questions:-
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (3) was he ever of the braahmana "caste" since he never underwent
>>>>>>>> any of our samskaarams including jaatha karmam, naama karanam,
>>>>>>>> anna-praashanam, chaulam, ear-piercimg, aayushya-homam, upanayanam,
>>>>>>>> vivaaham?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (4) did he or did he not condemn, despise, denigrate, insult,
>>>>>>>> discredit all vaadhyaars without whom he could not have any of these
>>>>>>>> samskaarams performed?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (5) has he ever heard of the kriya called the vichinnaagni
>>>>>>>> santhaanam?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (6) does he know why, by whom, and how it is performed?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (7) did he marry according to the rules prescribed for Brahmins and
>>>>>>>> Hindus, involving the sapthapadi circumambulation of the agni, or did 
>>>>>>>> he do
>>>>>>>> a prosaic civil act before a government officer such as an assistant
>>>>>>>> registrar or a registrar and proceed to consummation?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (8) does he know what is the "naandi" ritual performed before
>>>>>>>> upanayanam, vivaaham, shraaddham, shashti-abda-poorthi, and 
>>>>>>>> sathabhishekam?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (9) does he know by whom and for whom and why is it performed?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (10) does he know what is agnihothram?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (11) if so, which has he performed, and on what occasion?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> S Narayanaswamy Iyer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:42 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Section IX - Meditation on the Vaisvanavara Fire
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Chapter V
>>>>>>>> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-brihadaranyaka-upanishad/d/doc122185.html>
>>>>>>>>  *Verse
>>>>>>>> 5.9.1: Brahadaranyaka Upanishad*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Kathopanishad Vaishvanaram verse of Nachiketa speaks about the
>>>>>>>> yagnam the Vedic must perform, connecting his soul to the fire agni @
>>>>>>>> Vaisnavara=human Agni. Vedam oduvarrkku ore mazhai means the strict 
>>>>>>>> vediyar
>>>>>>>> addicted to being a Brahmin. The Vaishvanaran who begets th fire on the
>>>>>>>> Brahma yagnam, must preserve it till death when his atman gets 
>>>>>>>> purified by
>>>>>>>> that Agni. Hence Crossing the ocean is prohibited for the tri varnas 
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> especially to the true Brahmin.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    The prohibition is clearly stated in several scriptures. The
>>>>>>>> Baudhayana Sutra, one of the Hindu Dharma Shastras, says that “making
>>>>>>>> voyages by sea” (II.1.2.2) is an offense which will cause
>>>>>>>> pataniya, loss of caste. It offers a rather difficult penance:
>>>>>>>> “They shall eat every fourth mealtime a little food, bathe at the time 
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> the three libations (morning, noon and evening), passing the day 
>>>>>>>> standing
>>>>>>>> and the night sitting. After the lapse of three years, they throw off 
>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>> guilt.” Harsha Ramamurthy in his erudite article on the issue, explains
>>>>>>>> that, according to Baudhayana Sutra, the highest authority in deciding 
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> question of dharma is shruti, our primary scriptures, the Vedas and 
>>>>>>>> Agamas.
>>>>>>>> Next is the smriti, the secondary scriptures, which include the Dharma
>>>>>>>> Shastras. Third is sampradaya, the teachings and practices of a 
>>>>>>>> specific
>>>>>>>> lineage. He concludes, “ because of the bans in smriti and sampradaya, 
>>>>>>>> such
>>>>>>>> travel is considered a banned activity.” He added that the ban applies 
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> all three upper castes, and not just brahmins. It also applies to
>>>>>>>> sannyasins, who–in his tradition–can only be from the brahmin caste.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      Why the ban?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In the Baudhayana Sutra, the ban is discussed in the context of a
>>>>>>>> description of the geographical limits of India which concludes that 
>>>>>>>> within
>>>>>>>> its boundary “spiritual pre-eminence is found.” Generally, two reasons 
>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>> given by scholars for the ban. The first is that it is impossible to
>>>>>>>> maintain one’s required daily religious observances on a ship, 
>>>>>>>> particularly
>>>>>>>> thrice-daily personal worship. The second is that one will incur the 
>>>>>>>> sin of
>>>>>>>> mlecchas samparka, usually politely translated as mixing with 
>>>>>>>> foreigners.
>>>>>>>> Mlecchas, however, is more accurately translated as “barbarian” or
>>>>>>>> “savage.” “I am told,” he said, “that there is a penance to be 
>>>>>>>> performed
>>>>>>>> when a sannyasin or priest crosses the ocean. The existence of this 
>>>>>>>> penance
>>>>>>>> shows that as per the need and their own deeper vision, a sannyasin or
>>>>>>>> priest can cross the ocean to preserve and make his mother religion
>>>>>>>> flourish. *But this should not be done for any materialistic
>>>>>>>> need.”*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      Dr. A.V. Ramana Dikshitulu, head priest of the Balaji Temple
>>>>>>>> in Tirumala, one of India’s most respected and popular pilgrimage
>>>>>>>> destinations, said, “None of our priests who serve in the main sanctum 
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> cross the ocean. Neither I nor any member of my family have done so,
>>>>>>>> despite lucrative offers from abroad. Serving the Lord here is most
>>>>>>>> important to us. The Balaji Temple is governed by the Vaikhanasa 
>>>>>>>> Agama. It
>>>>>>>> says that the people outside India are akin to mlecchas, barbarians, 
>>>>>>>> who do
>>>>>>>> not follow any rules or code of conduct, and therefore it forbids 
>>>>>>>> visiting
>>>>>>>> such places. These places have habits, food, relationships and other 
>>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>>> which could make us corrupt and impure.”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>            sunrise, midday and sunset, called trikal gayatri
>>>>>>>> sandhya,” he explained. “*This trikal sandhya cannot be performed
>>>>>>>> on a plane or ship; it must be done on the earth.” *Dr. Ramana
>>>>>>>> Dikshitulu does not specifically rule out “crossing” an ocean, for he
>>>>>>>> himself flies occasionally from Chennai to Kolkata, a flight which 
>>>>>>>> goes out
>>>>>>>> over the Bay of Bengal. But as that flight is only two hours long, he 
>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>> not miss his trikal sandhya as he would on a longer flight or a voyage 
>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>> ship, and he does not land outside India. *He was unaware of any
>>>>>>>> penance to offset crossing the ocean.*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>           Clearly the Dharma Shastras’ ban on ocean travel was
>>>>>>>> intended to maintain the religious strength and purity of the 
>>>>>>>> individual,
>>>>>>>> and to prevent negative external influence from non-Hindu cultures. 
>>>>>>>> Other
>>>>>>>> cultures had the same concern. One can note that the very word 
>>>>>>>> barbarian
>>>>>>>> (used to translate mleccha with a strongly negative connotation), just
>>>>>>>> meant “foreigner,” in the original Greek, yet came to describe an
>>>>>>>> uncultured or brutish person. Baudhayana Sutra makes the point more 
>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>> once to delineate ancient India’s boundaries and declare it a sacred 
>>>>>>>> land
>>>>>>>> out of which one should not step
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *       Hence Nachiketa Vaisvanara concept  eduvated by Dharma Raja
>>>>>>>> applied to Brahmins who did not cross the ocean and for such alone ore
>>>>>>>> mazhai is possible. Brahadaranyaka Upanishad states as under: *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> अयमाग्निर्वैश्वानरो योऽयमन्तः पुरुषे, येनेदमन्नं पच्यते यदिदमद्यते;
>>>>>>>> तस्यैष घोषो भवति यमेतत्कर्णावपिधाय शृणोति; स यदोत्क्रमिष्यन्भवति
>>>>>>>> नैनं घोषं शृणोति ॥ १ ॥
>>>>>>>> इति नवमं ब्राह्मणम् ॥
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ayamāgnirvaiśvānaro yo'yamantaḥ puruṣe, yenedamannaṃ pacyate
>>>>>>>> yadidamadyate; tasyaiṣa ghoṣo bhavati yametatkarṇāvapidhāya śṛṇoti; sa
>>>>>>>> yadotkramiṣyanbhavati nainaṃ ghoṣaṃ śṛṇoti || 1 ||
>>>>>>>> iti navamaṃ brāhmaṇam ||
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. This fire that is within a man and digests the food that is
>>>>>>>> eaten, is Vaiśvānara. It emits this sound that one hears by stopping 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> ears thus. When a man is about to leave the body, he no more hears this
>>>>>>>> sound.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is another meditation like the preceding ones. *This fire is
>>>>>>>> Vaiśvānara.* Which fire? This *that* is *within a man.* Is it the
>>>>>>>> element fire that is one of the components of the body? No, it is the 
>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>> called Vaiśvānara, which *digests the food.* Which food? The food *that
>>>>>>>> is eaten* by men. That is to say, the heat in the stomach. For
>>>>>>>> direct sign of it the text says: As that fire digests the food, *it
>>>>>>>> emits this sound. *What is it? *That one hears by stopping the
>>>>>>>> ears thus,* with one’s fingers. The word ‘Etat’ is an adverb
>>>>>>>> (meaning ‘thus’). One should meditate upon that fire as Vaiśvānara, or
>>>>>>>> Virāj. Here too the result is identification with it. Incidentally a 
>>>>>>>> death
>>>>>>>> omen is being described: *(When a man,* the experiencer in this
>>>>>>>> body *is about to leave the body, he no more hears this sound*.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> K RAJARAM  IRS   16 8 23
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> On Facebook, please join
>>>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts :
>>>>>>>> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions:
>>>>>>>> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "KeralaIyers" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZorKvXymajQYXU7E%2BtfBBeqNGF8Q9J54mJ7CLJNw4AYMKg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZorKvXymajQYXU7E%2BtfBBeqNGF8Q9J54mJ7CLJNw4AYMKg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "iyer123" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhNQOe5bicsZkoGQhVXTJLowEAK-ckvuohdO198CjOmbog%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhNQOe5bicsZkoGQhVXTJLowEAK-ckvuohdO198CjOmbog%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "iyer123" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/1048300645.806149.1692277413432%40mail.yahoo.com
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/1048300645.806149.1692277413432%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooSjWR%3DfEpowg9Q6ZogpTjPjH9bRr0G3d4Fxk%3DJZzV%3DMg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to