Sirs, My main point is that machines have become Gods. YM On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 10:58 AM Rangarajan T.N.C. <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was told that nasthika means not accepting the existence of a deity in > the murthy. Asthika says asthi - meaning the deity is there and nasthika > says na asthi - it is not there. I don't think nasthika means that there is > no bhaghavan at all. Corrolory - muslims are nasthikas because they say > that allah cannot be depicted but agree that allah exists. > > On Saturday, 2 December, 2023 at 10:39:30 am IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Fanatical atheism" typically refers to an extreme and uncompromising form > of atheism, where individuals vehemently reject the existence of any > deities or supernatural entities and actively oppose or criticize religious > beliefs. It's important to note that atheism itself is simply the lack of > belief in gods or deities, and not all atheists are fanatical or extreme in > their views. > > Fanatical atheism might manifest as aggressive criticism of religion, > intolerance towards religious practices, and a strong commitment to > promoting secularism. It can sometimes be associated with anti-theism, > which goes beyond mere disbelief in gods to actively opposing the influence > of religion in society. > > As with any belief system, it's essential to recognize that individuals > within a particular group can have a wide range of perspectives and > attitudes. Not all atheists hold fanatical views, and many engage in > respectful dialogue with people of different religious beliefs. As with any > worldview, it's important to approach discussions about atheism or religion > with an open mind and a willingness to engage in respectful and > constructive conversations. > > In shadows deep, where reason reigns, > > A whispered creed, unbound by chains. Fanatical atheism, bold and stark, A > skeptic's quest, in shadows dark. > > No gods above to guide the way, No cosmic hand in night or day. The > skeptic's gaze, sharp and keen, In realms unseen, no gods are seen. > > With logic's sword, they cut through mist, Dismiss the tales that > preachers twist. In fervent doubt, their minds take flight, Rejecting > dogma, embracing light. > > No prayers ascend, no hymns resound, In reason's temple, truth is found. > The fanatical atheist stands tall, Against the gods, against the fall. > > Yet in their passion, let them see, That empathy and grace can be. For > varied minds in this grand play, Each seeking truth in their own way. > > Fanaticism, a double-edged sword, In skepticism, let love be stored. For > in the quest for what is true, May understanding bloom and grow. K Rajaram > IRS 2 12 23 > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: *Markendeya Yeddanapudi* <[email protected]> > Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 at 09:13 > Subject: The Paradox of Fanatical Atheism > To: ggroup <[email protected]>, thatha patty < > [email protected]>, <[email protected]>, > Satyanarayana Kunamneni <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, > viswanatham vangapally <[email protected]>, Kunamneni > Satyanarayana <[email protected]>, Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > [email protected]>, Ramamurti PV <[email protected]>, Rangarajan > T.N.C. <[email protected]>, Ramu S <[email protected]>, Deepali > Hadker <[email protected]>, Krishnamacharyulu Nanduri < > [email protected]> > > > > > -- > *Mar*The Paradox of Fanatical Atheism > > > > The day today culture of living standardizes the internal hormonal > communication created by the bloodstream.Today; machines determine and > govern our day today life. We no longer trust nature, and leave to nature > our living. We no longer understand by feeling nature directly as part of > nature. We have become the machine fanatics. We are loyal to Rene > Descartes, and treat every life form as an emotionless and feelings less > machine. Our hormonal communication is taken over by machines. > > The paradox is while every organism is striving and struggling to live in > nature as nature, we the humans are trying to be machines, the Robots. It > appears that God is staying in every life form while the same God is > refusing to enter us. The pineal gland is not working, as God has vacated > it. Rene Descartes blundered, but his Cartesian approach, and mechanization > vandalizes, devastates and destroys nature. We have been cyborging nature > with industrialization, urbanization and with many technologies including > the GM intrusion into our foods. > > Theism flowing from the Theosphere was part of the Troposphere. We > breathed belief in nature continuously, and breathing created and governed > the emotional routine of life.Nature, when free, flashed brilliant and > shattering revelations as enlightenments continuously. It took over the > hormonal communication of every organism, and created the grand > coordination of the hormonal communication of every organism. The Biosphere > functioned as one single organism. Every organism was a student in the > symbiotic learning from nature. > > Nature was the ultimate college.God, the teacher could be smelt and > breathing was learning. As God partnered there was no need for any > definition and scope clutch. In fact one could start from anywhere without > beginning with definitions and scopes. Learning was participation in nature > as nature. Every organism joined the great college instantly after birth, > and there was no definition hurdle. One started without definitions, just > breathing was the start. > > Now we have created the economic man, that Darwinian monster, fighting in > the Social Darwinism, to become the successful rogue. To be the economic > man he has taken to Atheism, the euphemism for mechanization of everything. > > Can we remove emotions and emotional communication from our and also the > hormonal communications of all organisms of the Biosphere, without becoming > extinct? But the fanatical atheism that bludgeons mechanization and removal > of nature in every activity is now in terrible frenzy. > > There is an urgent need to create areas where there is no technology at > all and where there is no economic tampering by humans. We are now > confronting the ultimate paradox, the Atheist who defends technology > emotionally! > > Robots are creating poems and songs, very precise, accurate etc where no > professional editor can change. But they do not touch our internal hormonal > communication. When machines do the loving and living for us atheistically, > where are we going and where is aesthetics? > > YM > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thatha_Patty" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoq6W%3D9G2emfqBQ_b4eO2Q8V5PnyVzOLAJN%3Dh9FMDzvzbA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoq6W%3D9G2emfqBQ_b4eO2Q8V5PnyVzOLAJN%3Dh9FMDzvzbA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- *Mar* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2Bm%2B9SdrEHNxBpeVNSknRBMctN-3qxUrR%2BgY5bF5UXo%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com.
