Respected sir,
Very correct. Similarly christians. They believe in Jesus.
Gopalakrishnan
On Saturday, 2 December, 2023 at 10:58:54 am IST, 'Rangarajan T.N.C.' via
Thatha_Patty <[email protected]> wrote:
I was told that nasthika means not accepting the existence of a deity in the
murthy. Asthika says asthi - meaning the deity is there and nasthika says na
asthi - it is not there. I don't think nasthika means that there is no
bhaghavan at all. Corrolory - muslims are nasthikas because they say that allah
cannot be depicted but agree that allah exists.
On Saturday, 2 December, 2023 at 10:39:30 am IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy
<[email protected]> wrote:
Fanatical atheism" typically refers to an extreme and uncompromising form of
atheism, where individuals vehemently reject the existence of any deities or
supernatural entities and actively oppose or criticize religious beliefs. It's
important to note that atheism itself is simply the lack of belief in gods or
deities, and not all atheists are fanatical or extreme in their views.
Fanatical atheism might manifest as aggressive criticism of religion,
intolerance towards religious practices, and a strong commitment to promoting
secularism. It can sometimes be associated with anti-theism, which goes beyond
mere disbelief in gods to actively opposing the influence of religion in
society.
As with any belief system, it's essential to recognize that individuals within
a particular group can have a wide range of perspectives and attitudes. Not all
atheists hold fanatical views, and many engage in respectful dialogue with
people of different religious beliefs. As with any worldview, it's important to
approach discussions about atheism or religion with an open mind and a
willingness to engage in respectful and constructive conversations.
In shadows deep, where reason reigns,
A whispered creed, unbound by chains.Fanatical atheism, bold and stark,A
skeptic's quest, in shadows dark.
No gods above to guide the way,No cosmic hand in night or day.The skeptic's
gaze, sharp and keen,In realms unseen, no gods are seen.
With logic's sword, they cut through mist,Dismiss the tales that preachers
twist.In fervent doubt, their minds take flight,Rejecting dogma, embracing
light.
No prayers ascend, no hymns resound,In reason's temple, truth is found.The
fanatical atheist stands tall,Against the gods, against the fall.
Yet in their passion, let them see,That empathy and grace can be.For varied
minds in this grand play,Each seeking truth in their own way.
Fanaticism, a double-edged sword,In skepticism, let love be stored.For in the
quest for what is true,May understanding bloom and grow. K Rajaram IRS 2 12 23
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Markendeya Yeddanapudi <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 at 09:13
Subject: The Paradox of Fanatical Atheism
To: ggroup <[email protected]>, thatha patty
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Satyanarayana
Kunamneni <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, viswanatham vangapally
<[email protected]>, Kunamneni Satyanarayana <[email protected]>,
Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]>, Ramamurti PV
<[email protected]>, Rangarajan T.N.C. <[email protected]>, Ramu S
<[email protected]>, Deepali Hadker <[email protected]>,
Krishnamacharyulu Nanduri <[email protected]>
--
MarTheParadox of Fanatical Atheism
Theday today culture of living standardizes the internal hormonal
communicationcreated by the bloodstream.Today; machines determine and govern
our day today life.We no longer trust nature, and leave to nature our living.
We no longerunderstand by feeling nature directly as part of nature. We have
become themachine fanatics. We are loyal to Rene Descartes, and treat every
life form asan emotionless and feelings less machine. Our hormonal
communication is takenover by machines.
Theparadox is while every organism is striving and struggling to live in nature
asnature, we the humans are trying to be machines, the Robots. It appears
thatGod is staying in every life form while the same God is refusing to enter
us.The pineal gland is not working, as God has vacated it. Rene Descartes
blundered,but his Cartesian approach, and mechanization vandalizes, devastates
anddestroys nature. We have been cyborging nature with
industrialization,urbanization and with many technologies including the GM
intrusion into ourfoods.
Theismflowing from the Theosphere was part of the Troposphere. We breathed
belief innature continuously, and breathing created and governed the emotional
routineof life.Nature, when free, flashed brilliant and shattering revelations
asenlightenments continuously. It took over the hormonal communication of
everyorganism, and created the grand coordination of the hormonal communication
ofevery organism. The Biosphere functioned as one single organism. Every
organismwas a student in the symbiotic learning from nature.
Naturewas the ultimate college.God, the teacher could be smelt and breathing
was learning.As God partnered there was no need for any definition and scope
clutch. In factone could start from anywhere without beginning with definitions
and scopes.Learning was participation in nature as nature. Every organism
joined the greatcollege instantly after birth, and there was no definition
hurdle. One startedwithout definitions, just breathing was the start.
Nowwe have created the economic man, that Darwinian monster, fighting in
theSocial Darwinism, to become the successful rogue. To be the economic man he
hastaken to Atheism, the euphemism for mechanization of everything.
Canwe remove emotions and emotional communication from our and also the
hormonalcommunications of all organisms of the Biosphere, without becoming
extinct? Butthe fanatical atheism that bludgeons mechanization and removal of
nature inevery activity is now in terrible frenzy.
Thereis an urgent need to create areas where there is no technology at all and
wherethere is no economic tampering by humans. We are now confronting the
ultimate paradox,the Atheist who defends technology emotionally!
Robotsare creating poems and songs, very precise, accurate etc where no
professionaleditor can change. But they do not touch our internal hormonal
communication.When machines do the loving and living for us atheistically,
where are we goingand where is aesthetics?
YM
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoq6W%3D9G2emfqBQ_b4eO2Q8V5PnyVzOLAJN%3Dh9FMDzvzbA%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/982040519.6466935.1701494926045%40mail.yahoo.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/1235291513.6468317.1701495790288%40mail.yahoo.com.
