> Does this mean I shouldn't be using "version.extensions....." at all?
I consider it good practice to use that namespace for plugins' functionality (public methods anyway). > Thanks Eric for going through the scenarios. The probability is so low > that a plugins would appear twice, and exponentially lower that it > would actually have any more effect than the performance overhead of > loading twice, that it does seem unnecessary. Also, one could argue that problems resulting from a plugin being loaded twice - while tricky to identify - should not be hidden from users; obscuring errors in the document could backfire in the long term. -- F. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
