> Also, one could argue that problems resulting from a plugin being loaded > twice - while tricky to identify - should not be hidden from users; > obscuring errors in the document could backfire in the long term.
That's true in general... but in the case of a repeated hijack, it can result in a 'too much recursion' fatal error on startup, making it impossible to fix from within the document itself. In this situation, I think it's better to have the check in place and 'fail safe' then it is to not check at all and 'fail naturally' due to conflicts between different versions of the same plugin. -e --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
