On Wednesday, January 29, 2020 at 3:52:29 AM UTC-8, PMario wrote: > > I think "hiding" information, for performance reasons, without a clear and > visible info isn't best practice. So as a user I would expect to get some > info, that there are more levels, but I'm not able to see them. As a second > step I would demand a possibility to see everything. >
I don't view the purpose of a "max" depth limit as a way to address some kind of "performance" issue. Consider the following possible use-case: Suppose I have a "primary" TOC tree that has 3 levels that might represent product categories/sub-categories, navigating down to individual products entries. Then, clicking a product entry opens a separate tiddler that has it's own "secondary" TOC tree with product-specific levels such as "description", "specifications", "reviews", "images", etc. I can also imagine having a input control to enter the "max" level to be shown in the "primary" tree so that you could easily change from "show the top 3 levels" to "show all levels", simply by clearing the input value. -e -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/996ec538-9e94-4086-b2fc-3966320aae53%40googlegroups.com.
