A Gloom wrote: > > ... As for official action, I weigh in on reverse quarantine-- isolate (to > protect) the vulenerible parts of society while the virus runs its > inevitable course (there's not realistic detection and therefor tracking of > the virus' spread to be able to contain it). One of the first places the > virus hit in the US was a nursing home and it was like throwing gasoline on > a fire. >
Right. Part of the issue with lockdown is also its very imperfect. I live in Italy on the border with Slovenia. I can't visit friends in Italy in the next town without filing a police request. But I can walk freely into Slovenia. The resources required to "lockdown" are huge. Many questions arise about whether better care for the sick better instead. TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/401f1155-cad4-47bf-b37a-47b4acac915d%40googlegroups.com.
