Mark S. wrote: > > Idea. We need curation, but the curation needs to be easy. >
I agree - but I don't agree that your proposal fulfills the "easy", at least not easy enough, for it to be workable in the longer run. (I'd happily be proven wrong, though!) IMO people are willing to provide extremely simple meta data via a click (e.g a thumbs up or selecting predefined tags) or possibly to type a word or two, but that's already pushing it. And, perhaps even more critically, it has to be done "here", not "over there". I don't even think a solution where you're supposed to merely *scroll *elsewhere would work. That is, if we expect "an average forum user" to contribute. Think youtube likes or almost all social systems. Relying on a few individuals is not only unsustainable but it also makes the curation less meaningful because it becomes more biased. But again, I'm happily proven wrong. BTW, I bet you've all forgotten WHitWoT by Daniel Baird: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/tiddlywiki/WHitWoT%7Csort:date <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c1764aea-b221-4940-ab4d-5e3702d95fe7%40googlegroups.com.
